Phytoplankton biomass and composition of Kootenay Lake, British Columbia, following reductions in phosphorus loading

1990 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 314-318
Author(s):  
R. D. Daley ◽  
F. R. Pick
1990 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 486-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. T. Johnston

A comparison of the growth of vertically-migrating kokanee (Oncorhynchus nerka) fry and nonmigrating fry confined to the epilimnion in thermally-stratified Kootenay Lake, British Columbia rejected the bioenergetic efficiency hypothesis for the adaptive significance of vertical migration. Growth rates were higher for nonmigrating fry than for vertically-migrating fry. Geometric mean wet weights in early October were 2.88 g for non-migrating fry and 1.40 g for vertically-migrating fry of the same stock. The geometric mean weight of fry of a second stock rearing in the isothermal West Arm, in which behavioural thermoregulation by vertical migration was not possible, was 8.54 g in early October.


1989 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 770-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. H. Nicholls ◽  
D. A. Hurley

A 50% reduction in phosphorus loading to the upper Bay of Quinte (Lake Ontario) from municipal sources in 1977 was followed by a major decline in phytoplankton biomass in 1978. However, by 1984–85, biomasses again approached those of the pre-phosphorus control period, despite continued low phosphorus loadings. No major shifts in phytoplankton composition occurred; domination by the diatoms Melosira and Stephanodiscus spp. and the blue-green algae Anabaena and Aphanizomenon spp. has continued. Highly significant positive correlation coefficients (r = 0.92–0.98) were found for phytoplankton — fish relationships during both the pre- and postphosphorus removal periods which coincided with pre- and postdie-off periods of white perch (Morone americana) and alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus). For the entire 16-yr period of data collection, a multiple regression model fitting upper bay phytoplankton biomass (with an adjusted R2 of 0.83) was developed with five input variables. White perch biomass alone explained more than 50% of the variance in the model. It is hypothesized that trophic interactions among other biotic components in the Bay of Quinte may be very important in controlling phytoplankton biomass.


2005 ◽  
Vol 50 (12) ◽  
pp. 1585-1594 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.D. Levings ◽  
D.E. Varela ◽  
N.M. Mehlenbacher ◽  
K.L. Barry ◽  
G.E. Piercey ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
J M Journeay ◽  
S P Williams ◽  
J O Wheeler

1992 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 470-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Steeger ◽  
Hans Esselink ◽  
Ronald C. Ydenberg

We compared the general breeding and feeding ecology of ospreys (Pandion haliaetus) in the Creston and Nelson areas of southeastern British Columbia. In the Creston Valley, ospreys nested atop tall trees surrounding a shallow and productive warm-water marsh. Prey species taken by male ospreys included black bullhead (Ictalurus melas), pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus), and yellow perch (Perca flavescens). In contrast, near Nelson, ospreys nested on man-made structures along the narrow West Arm of Kootenay Lake. Osprey prey species in the Nelson area included longnose sucker (Catostomus catostomus), largescale sucker (Catostomus macrocheilus), and mountain whitefish (Prosopium williamsoni). Prey captured at Nelson were larger and contained significantly more energy than at Creston Valley, and hunting from a perch was used for 26% of all captures. All Creston Valley prey were caught by flight hunting. The strike success of foraging ospreys at Nelson was significantly higher than at Creston, and the net yield of flight hunting was 3 times higher. In spite of these differences, the breeding performance of ospreys in the two areas was very similar. Average clutch size was 2.8, brood size at hatching was 2.0, and the average pair fledged 1.4 young. The nest failure rate did not differ between the two areas. Most clutches were initiated in early May, with Nelson-area ospreys laying, on average, 4–7 days later. Egg volumes were smaller at Nelson (66.6 vs. 69.1 cm3). However, the rate at which nestlings gained mass was significantly greater at Nelson. We discuss reasons why the breeding performance varies so little in spite of the great differences in feeding regime.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document