scholarly journals Housing vacancy and hypervacant neighborhoods: Uneven recovery after the U.S. foreclosure crisis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Austin Harrison ◽  
Dan Immergluck
2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 616-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin B. Anacker

Although race and ethnicity have been analyzed and discussed in the context of the national foreclosure crisis, there has been little work on neighborhoods in which different Asian subgroups reside, which is surprising given the relatively large demographic, economic, and social differences. Based on NSP 3 data, provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and 2005/2009 American Community Survey (ACS) data, provided by the U.S. Bureau of the Census, this article utilizes descriptive statistics and weighted least squares (WLS) regressions to analyze rates of seriously delinquent mortgages for Census tracts in all Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), differentiating among different Asian subgroups. Findings show that neighborhoods with Hmong, Laotian, and Cambodian households had relatively high rates of seriously delinquent mortgages, whereas neighborhoods with Chinese, Japanese, and Pakistani households had relatively low rates of seriously delinquent mortgages.


2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 745-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Crump ◽  
Kathe Newman ◽  
Eric S. Belsky ◽  
Phil Ashton ◽  
David H. Kaplan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 346-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel B. Aalbers

It has  become common practice—and in particular, but not exclusively, in conservative media—to blame the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) of 1977 for the U.S. subprime mortgage and foreclosure crisis that triggered the global financial crisis. It is argued that the CRA forced lenders to give mortgage loans to high–risk borrowers. This is nonsense for at least five reasons.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document