scholarly journals A Community Art Therapy Group for Adults With Chronic Pain

Art Therapy ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 158-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aimee O'Neill ◽  
Hilary Moss
2020 ◽  
pp. 101749
Author(s):  
Noah Hass-Cohen ◽  
Rebecca Bokoch ◽  
Katherine Goodman ◽  
K.J. Conover

Arts & Health ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rossana L. De Feudis ◽  
Giusi Graziano ◽  
Tiziana Lanciano ◽  
Manuela Garofoli ◽  
Andrea Lisi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. 101687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shona Lavey-Khan ◽  
Dean Reddick

2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennie C. I. Tsao ◽  
Marcia Meldrum ◽  
Su C. Kim ◽  
Margaret C. Jacob ◽  
Lonnie K. Zeltzer

CAM therapies have become increasingly popular in pediatric populations. Yet, little is known about children's preferences for CAM. This study examined treatment preferences in chronic pediatric pain patients offered a choice of CAM therapies for their pain. Participants were 129 children (94 girls) (mean age = 14.5 years ± 2.4; range = 8–18 years) presenting at a multidisciplinary, tertiary clinic specializing in pediatric chronic pain. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine the relationships between CAM treatment preferences and patient's sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, as well as their self-reported level of functioning. Over 60% of patients elected to try at least one CAM approach for pain. The most popular CAM therapies were biofeedback, yoga and hypnosis; the least popular were art therapy and energy healing, with craniosacral, acupuncture and massage being intermediate. Patients with a diagnosis of fibromyalgia (80%) were the most likely to try CAM versus those with other pain diagnoses. In multivariate analyses, pain duration emerged as a significant predictor of CAM preferences. For mind-based approaches (i.e. hypnosis, biofeedback and art therapy), pain duration and limitations in family activities were both significant predictors. When given a choice of CAM therapies, this sample of children with chronic pain, irrespective of pain diagnosis, preferred non-invasive approaches that enhanced relaxation and increased somatic control. Longer duration of pain and greater impairment in functioning, particularly during family activities increased the likelihood that such patients agreed to engage in CAM treatments, especially those that were categorized as mind-based modalities.


2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 214-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Pielech ◽  
Christine B. Sieberg ◽  
Laura E. Simons
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 175-178
Author(s):  
Harold Merskey ◽  
Ellen N Thompson

The trial by Gale et al (pages 185-189) is a valuable example of a negative result - the sort of finding that is published less often than a positive one. But, we can learn from the failure, both in understanding correct treatment and in planning future trials. Patients were recruited in a clinic where repeated treatment by nerve blocks is used as a palliative measure for chronic pain of all types. They were then offered the choice of entering a group with cognitive behavioural therapy or continuing with nerve blocks. For ethical reasons, patients could freely leave either branch of the trial without prejudice. At the onset, one of 34 patients in the nerve-block group left, while 12 departed from the cognitive therapy group. All 33 patients remaining in the nerve block group completed the eight-week trial, while only four of 34 patients completed it in the cognitive therapy group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document