Gender differences in the association of smartphone use with the vitality and mental health of adolescent students

2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (7) ◽  
pp. 693-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shang-Yu Yang ◽  
Chung-Ying Lin ◽  
Yueh-Chu Huang ◽  
Jer-Hao Chang
Author(s):  
Weilong Chen ◽  
Yi Huang ◽  
Abanoub Riad

Many previous studies have indicated that urban adolescents show a higher level of mental health in China compared to rural adolescents. Specifically, girls in rural areas represented a high-risk group prior to the 21st century, demonstrating more suicidal behaviour and ideation than those in the urban areas because of the severe gender inequality in rural China. However, because of the urbanisation process and centralised policy to eliminate gender inequality in recent decades, the regional and gender differences in mental health might decrease. This research aimed to probe the gender and regional differences in depressive traits among adolescent students currently in China. We adopted the national survey dataset Chinese Family Panel Studies (CFPS) conducted in 2018. Accordingly, 2173 observations from 10–15-year-old subjects were included. CFPS utilised an eight-item questionnaire to screen individuals’ depressive traits. Two dimensions of depressive traits were confirmed by CFA, namely depressed affect and anhedonia. The measurement invariance tests suggested that the two-factor model was applicable for both males and females and rural and urban students. Based on the extracted values from the CFA model, MANOVA results revealed that, compared to boys, girls experienced more depressed affect. Moreover, rural students demonstrated more anhedonia symptoms. There was no interaction between gender and region. The results suggest that, even though the gender and regional differences are small, being a female and coming from a rural area are still potential risk factors for developing depressive traits among adolescent students in China.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Cramer ◽  
Martha Shumway ◽  
Amanda M. Amacker ◽  
Dale E. McNiel ◽  
Sarah Holley ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim A. Kira ◽  
Hanaa Shuwiekh ◽  
Mireille Bujold-Bugeaud

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Younyoung Choi ◽  
Ja Hyouk Koo ◽  
Eun Young Kim

2007 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. S323-S329 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.-S. Jeon ◽  
S.-N. Jang ◽  
S.-J. Rhee ◽  
I. Kawachi ◽  
S.-I. Cho

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deniz Yucel ◽  
Beth A. Latshaw

The present study uses Wave 8 of the German Family Panel to test the spillover and crossover effects of work-family conflict on job satisfaction, relationship satisfaction, and mental health for individuals (actor effects) as well as their spouses/partners (partner effects) in dual-earning couples. We further contribute by assessing whether the results vary by gender and union type. Results suggest that among married couples, for job satisfaction, there are no gender differences in actor effects (but gender differences in partner effects), and actor and partner effects remain distinct. For relationship satisfaction, there are no gender differences in actor or partner effects, but both effects remain distinct. For mental health, however, there are gender differences in actor effects (but not in partner effects), and both effects remain distinct. Among cohabitors, there are no differences in actor effects by gender, and adding in partner effects does not significantly improve the models predicting all three outcomes. Some results also suggest differences in relationship dynamics between married and cohabiting couples.


2014 ◽  
pp. 47-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrianna Mendrek ◽  
Serge Marchand ◽  
Isabelle Gaumond

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 849-853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehnaz Nuruddin Gitay ◽  
Sarah Fatima ◽  
Shahama Arshad ◽  
Basmah Arshad ◽  
Ahsan Ehtesham ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document