Association between sex, race/ethnicity, season, day of week, and alcohol use and related risks in college student athletes and nonathletes

2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. 422-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine R. Mastroleo ◽  
Nancy P. Barnett ◽  
Kristie M. Bowers
Keyword(s):  
College Student ◽  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Student Athletes ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
College Student Athletes

Religiosity, Alcohol Use, and Sex Behaviors Among College Student-Athletes

2011 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 930-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin W. Moore ◽  
Jannette Y. Berkley-Patton ◽  
Starlyn M. Hawes
Keyword(s):  
College Student ◽  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Student Athletes ◽  
Sex Behaviors ◽  
College Student Athletes

Measuring Drug and Alcohol Use Among College Student-Athletes*

2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 369-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
James N. Druckman ◽  
Mauro Gilli ◽  
Samara Klar ◽  
Joshua Robison
Keyword(s):  
College Student ◽  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Student Athletes ◽  
Drug And Alcohol Use ◽  
Drug And Alcohol ◽  
College Student Athletes

Social Influences, Alcohol Expectancies, and Hazardous Alcohol Use Among College Athletes

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janine V. Olthuis ◽  
Byron L. Zamboanga ◽  
Matthew P. Martens ◽  
Lindsay S. Ham
Keyword(s):  
College Student ◽  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Student Athletes ◽  
College Athletes ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Injunctive Norms ◽  
Hazardous Alcohol Use ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Hazardous Alcohol ◽  
College Student Athletes

Research has shown that college student-athletes are at increased risk for hazardous alcohol use. As such, this study examined social and cognitive influences on athletes’ alcohol consumption by exploring the association between injunctive norms (parental, teammate, and coach approval) and hazardous alcohol use among college athletes, and testing whether alcohol expectancy outcomes and valuations would mediate this association. College student-athletes (n = 301; mean age = 19.4, SD = 1.3) completed self-report questionnaires assessing their drinking behaviors and perceptions of alcohol use in their social environment. Structural equation modeling revealed, in all but one case, a direct association between each of the injunctive norms variables and hazardous alcohol use. In addition, negative expectancy valuations mediated the association between teammate approval and hazardous alcohol use. Injunctive norms emerged as an important factor in student-athletes’ alcohol use. Implications for alcohol intervention programming among student-athletes are discussed.

scholarly journals Perceived norms and alcohol use among first-year college student-athletes' different types of friends

2016 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelley E. C. Massengale ◽  
Alice Ma ◽  
Kelly L. Rulison ◽  
Jeffrey J. Milroy ◽  
David L. Wyrick
Keyword(s):  
College Student ◽  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Student Athletes ◽  
First Year ◽  
Perceived Norms ◽  
First Year College ◽  
Different Types ◽  
College Student Athletes

scholarly journals Risk for excessive alcohol use and drinking-related problems in college student athletes

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 1546-1556 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Yusko ◽  
Jennifer F. Buckman ◽  
Helene R. White ◽  
Robert J. Pandina
Keyword(s):  
College Student ◽  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Student Athletes ◽  
Excessive Alcohol ◽  
College Student Athletes

“Detrimental to the Team Dynamic”: Exploring College Student-Athlete Dissent

2021 ◽  
pp. 216747952110019
Author(s):  
Rikishi T. Rey ◽  
Zac D. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
College Student ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Student Athletes ◽  
Athletic Trainers ◽  
School Level ◽  
Student Athlete ◽  
College Level ◽  
High School Level ◽  
College Student Athletes

To properly manage college student-athlete dissent, stakeholders (e.g., coaches, teammates, administration, athletic trainers, etc.) must first recognize the situations that cause athletes to dissent. Although athletic dissent is not a new concept, to date, it has only been examined at the high school level. To fill this gap, this study begins to explore this issue at the college level by examining the triggering agents that cause college student-athletes to communicate dissent. Participants ( N = 72) from 11 different sports were asked to complete multiple narratives in response to open ended questions after reflecting on a time where they communicated dissent. Results of a thematic analysis indicate that there are eight triggering agents of dissent, demonstrating distinct differences between high school and college student-athlete dissent due to various contextual factors. These findings highlight the needs and desires of college student-athletes which can help coaches, administration, and other stakeholders to promote positive college student-athlete experiences.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document