scholarly journals Women’s preference of therapist based on sex of therapist and presenting problem: An analog study

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 330-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara J. Landes ◽  
Jessica R. Burton ◽  
Kevin M. King ◽  
Bryce F. Sullivan
Keyword(s):  
Analog Study

Isobaric-Analog Study of Zr90

1968 ◽  
Vol 175 (4) ◽  
pp. 1482-1493 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Lieb ◽  
James Kent ◽  
C. Moore
Keyword(s):  
Isobaric Analog ◽  
Analog Study

Analog Study and Performance of the New 440-Ft Ferries for the State of Washington

1975 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 146-162
Author(s):  
J. A. Beverley ◽  
R. L. Koch ◽  
E. C. Stewart ◽  
J. Weiks
Keyword(s):  
System Performance ◽  
The State ◽  
Design Tool ◽  
Propulsion System ◽  
Similar Data ◽  
Electrical System ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Analog Study ◽  
Walla Walla

This paper describes the ac-rectified dc propulsion system designed for the two ferry vessels, MV Spokane and MV Walla Walla, and reports the results of an analog study conducted as a design tool. Similar data are presented showing the results obtained by recording electrical system performance during builder's trials.

Analog study of dead-beat posicast control

1958 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Tallman ◽  
O. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Analog Study

The effect of carbonate cementation on permeability heterogeneity in fluvial aquifers: An outcrop analog study

2006 ◽  
Vol 184 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 267-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Matthew Davis ◽  
Nicole Delude Roy ◽  
Peter S. Mozley ◽  
John S. Hall
Keyword(s):  
Permeability Heterogeneity ◽  
Carbonate Cementation ◽  
Outcrop Analog ◽  
Analog Study

The Edinburgh Masker: A clinical analog study

1985 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Ann Sullender Moore ◽  
Martin R. Adams
Keyword(s):  
Analog Study

scholarly journals Effects of Genetic Counselor Self-Disclosure: an Experimental Analog Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-26
Author(s):  
Brianna Volz ◽  
Kathleen D. Valverde ◽  
Steven J. Robbins
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Counselor ◽  
Self Disclosure ◽  
Analog Study

Determination of Criminal Responsibility

1993 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHERYL K. HISCOCK ◽  
PAMELA J. RUSTEMIER ◽  
MERRILL HISCOCK
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Forced Choice ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Control Group ◽  
General Knowledge ◽  
Prison Inmates ◽  
Choice Tests ◽  
Cutoff Scores ◽  
Analog Study

The two-alternative forced-choice principle, which has been used to detect malingering and “hysterical” symptoms, was applied to the assessment of criminal responsibility in an analog study. Prison inmates and university students completed forced-choice tests of general knowledge and moral reasoning on which below-chance scores indicate dishonest performance. Subjects were assigned randomly to one of three groups: control, naive faking, and coached faking. Significantly greater proportions of subjects in the naive and coached faking groups than in the control group scored significantly below chance on each test. Cutoff scores to maximize accuracy of classification were established for both tests. Implications of the findings for detecting individuals who fake a lack of criminal responsibility are considered, as well as directions for future research with other populations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document