Bottleneck identification and ranking model for mine operations

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (14) ◽  
pp. 1178-1194
Author(s):  
M. Mustafa Kahraman ◽  
W. Pratt Rogers ◽  
Sean Dessureault
2012 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 223-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
José A. Joao ◽  
M. Aater Suleman ◽  
Onur Mutlu ◽  
Yale N. Patt

2020 ◽  
pp. 99-105
Author(s):  
J.E. Kulas ◽  
M. Falutsu
Keyword(s):  

2022 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Hui Luo ◽  
Zhifeng Bao ◽  
Gao Cong ◽  
J. Shane Culpepper ◽  
Nguyen Lu Dang Khoa

Traffic bottlenecks are a set of road segments that have an unacceptable level of traffic caused by a poor balance between road capacity and traffic volume. A huge volume of trajectory data which captures realtime traffic conditions in road networks provides promising new opportunities to identify the traffic bottlenecks. In this paper, we define this problem as trajectory-driven traffic bottleneck identification : Given a road network R , a trajectory database T , find a representative set of seed edges of size K of traffic bottlenecks that influence the highest number of road segments not in the seed set. We show that this problem is NP-hard and propose a framework to find the traffic bottlenecks as follows. First, a traffic spread model is defined which represents changes in traffic volume for each road segment over time. Then, the traffic diffusion probability between two connected segments and the residual ratio of traffic volume for each segment can be computed using historical trajectory data. We then propose two different algorithmic approaches to solve the problem. The first one is a best-first algorithm BF , with an approximation ratio of 1-1/ e . To further accelerate the identification process in larger datasets, we also propose a sampling-based greedy algorithm SG . Finally, comprehensive experiments using three different datasets compare and contrast various solutions, and provide insights into important efficiency and effectiveness trade-offs among the respective methods.


2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 511-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
HUA AI ◽  
DIANE LITMAN

AbstractWhile different user simulations are built to assist dialog system development, there is an increasing need to quickly assess the quality of the user simulations reliably. Previous studies have proposed several automatic evaluation measures for this purpose. However, the validity of these evaluation measures has not been fully proven. We present an assessment study in which human judgments are collected on user simulation qualities as the gold standard to validate automatic evaluation measures. We show that a ranking model can be built using the automatic measures to predict the rankings of the simulations in the same order as the human judgments. We further show that the ranking model can be improved by using a simple feature that utilizes time-series analysis.


2010 ◽  
Vol 132 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 393-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Faigle ◽  
Walter Kern ◽  
Britta Peis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document