Supporting engineering decisions through contextual, model-oriented communication and knowledge-based engineering in simulation-driven product development: an automotive case study

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Sandberg ◽  
Michael Lundin ◽  
Mats Näsström ◽  
Lars-Erik Lindgren ◽  
Daniel Berglund
2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-178
Author(s):  
Urcun John Tanik

Cyberphysical system design automation utilizing knowledge based engineering techniques with globally networked knowledge bases can tremendously improve the design process for emerging systems. Our goal is to develop a comprehensive architectural framework to improve the design process for cyberphysical systems (CPS) and implement a case study with Axiomatic Design Solutions Inc. to develop next generation toolsets utilizing knowledge-based engineering (KBE) systems adapted to multiple domains in the field of CPS design automation. The Cyberphysical System Design Automation Framework (CPSDAF) will be based on advances in CPS design theory based on current research and knowledge collected from global sources automatically via Semantic Web Services. A case study utilizing STEM students is discussed.


Author(s):  
Christopher Sauer ◽  
Bjoern Heling ◽  
Simon Schmutzler ◽  
Benjamin Schleich

Abstract Designers often lack important information about achievable manufacturing tolerances. Moreover tolerances are not considered from the beginning of product development. This often leads to inaccurately specified parts. Furthermore the full potential of the manufacturing departements is not used. This contribution tackles those areas by presenting a knowledge-based engineering workbench for automated tolerance specification, which has also been implemented using a commercial CAD system. This tool allows the designer to assign part tolerances that take into account the achievable accuracies for a specific manufacturing process, while at the same time allowing for specific part properties. The novelty of the presented approach can be found in the knowledge-based support of the product developers in tolerance specification by employing an engineering workbench. Moreover preprocessing for variation simulation and analysis is supported. It is possible to automate parts of the tolerance specification process, using the presented approach.


Author(s):  
Francesco Furini ◽  
Marco Rossoni ◽  
Giorgio Colombo

The study illustrated in this paper aims at analyzing the knowledge management issue related to product development. Especially, the focus is on the domains in which Knowledge-based Systems (KBE) and Design Automation (DA) tools could be adopted. In the past various studies, a lot of KBE and DA systems have been developed in multiple fields such as automotive, aerospace, energy, materials and manufacturing: the information treated in these studies are about data relatives to specific design, for example, of automotive engine components, aircraft structures, energy plants, advanced material and manufacturing or assembly lines. In all of these domain the organization and formalization of the knowledge is a critical issue. The adoption of a good strategy to manage data and information relative to products and processes involves benefits in the product development process. Different methodologies are described in literature. The two of the most used are the Object-Oriented (OO) and Ontology Engineering (OE) approaches. The former is one of the most common and adopted in the industrial domain, including a lot of implementations in the recent past years. The latter is more commonly used in other fields, like bio-engineering, used with the scope of management of experimental data; few implementation in industrial engineering have been considered. The article considers a brief description of the state of the art about Knowledge Based Engineering and Ontology Engineering. A case studies will be described and the benefits and disadvantages due to the use of the different methodologies will be discussed.


Author(s):  
Brian Burns

The Case Study has become a pedagogical vehicle ofchoice in helping engineering students to gain perspective on the multidisciplinary realities of design. What once were termed ‘war stories’ have evolved to a level where case studies are available and downloadable on all manner of topics. For the fundamental knowledge-based issues of engineering, example questions have commonly been created to help the student manoeuvre through all manner of possible combinations of application. The case study is not however fabricated, and relies on the reporting and documentation of a real design or engineering product development. In recent years many of these case studies have been related to ethics and communication, but very few have been related to ongoing product development and issues of Industrial Design. This is not surprising since the creation of such case studies is time consuming, and design is often a ‘messy’ process in which few companies would be keen to expose their failures along the way. Nevertheless case studies are a vital part of Engineering Design education and offer excellent potential for the development of the pedagogy vital to the dynamic formulation of Engineering Design Education. This paper references three design projects undertaken professionally by the author as an Industrial Designer working with predominantly engineering based companies. The aim is to identify critical aspects of these projects that could be used as lessons, perhaps, but not necessarily, as case studies, but to be incorporated into engineering design education.


2002 ◽  
Vol 2002.12 (0) ◽  
pp. 283-284
Author(s):  
Hiromitsu TOKISUE ◽  
Ichiro NISHIGAKI ◽  
Shunsuke MINAMI ◽  
Mitsuru Sakai

2012 ◽  
Vol 232 ◽  
pp. 823-827
Author(s):  
Frederic Danesi ◽  
Nicolas Gardan ◽  
Elvis Kwassi

This article focuses on the optimization of a design process, in the context of automotive subcontracting opportunity. This optimization is guided by the underlying manufacturing process and by the industrial knowledge. We first show that the actual design studies are biased by the final goal (a formal design) and do not take into account early industrial needs (a draft design to draw up an estimate). We then demonstrate how an automaker subcontractor optimizes the early design process thanks to industrial knowledge.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document