scholarly journals Benchlearning – an action research program for transforming leadership and school practices

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marit Aas ◽  
Kirsten F. Vennebo ◽  
Kjell A. Halvorsen
1969 ◽  
Vol 22 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 493-503
Author(s):  
Florence W. Rosenstock ◽  
Martin Goldman ◽  
Robert Rothenberg

1953 ◽  
Vol 61 (8) ◽  
pp. 500-501
Author(s):  
C. Leslie Cushman

2018 ◽  
Vol 04 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
Catia Branquinho ◽  
Ana Cerqueira ◽  
Lucia Ramiro ◽  
Margarida Gaspar de Matos

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Marina Apgar ◽  
Will Allen ◽  
Joelle Albert ◽  
Boru Douthwaite ◽  
Rodrigo Paz Ybarnegaray ◽  
...  

Many rural poor and marginalized people strive to make a living in social-ecological systems that are characterized by multiple and often inequitable interactions across agents, scale and space. Uncertainty and inequality in such systems require research and development interventions to be adaptive, support learning and to engage with underlying drivers of poverty. Such complexity-aware approaches to planning, monitoring and evaluating development interventions are gaining strength, yet, there is still little empirical evidence of what it takes to implement them in practice. In this paper, we share learning from an agricultural research program that used participatory action research and theory of change to foster learning and support transformative change in aquatic agricultural systems. We reflect on our use of critical reflection within participatory agricultural research interventions, and our use of theory of change to collectively surface and revisit assumptions about how change happens. We share learning on the importance of being strengths-based in engaging stakeholders across scales and building a common goal as a starting point, and then staging a more critical practice as capacity is built and opportunities for digging deeper emerge.


1955 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 251-252
Author(s):  
Maurice D. Wolff ◽  
Jeanne A. Wolff

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-68
Author(s):  
Mary Frances (Molly) Buckley-Marudas ◽  
John Dutton ◽  
Charles Ellenbogen ◽  
Grace Hui-Chen Huang ◽  
Sarah Schwab

This article shares insights from the experiences of three high school practitioners and two university faculty who participated in a school-university-based action research program as a voluntary part of the teachers’ professional development. The three high school practitioners conducted action research projects around questions that stemmed from and were relevant to their own teaching practice.  As part of the action research program, the practitioners were paired with university faculty to support the research. Building on practitioner inquiry traditions and critical case study methodologies, this study used qualitative methods to explore the experiences of practitioner action research processes.  Drawing on in-person meeting notes and reflective memos, four key ideas emerged: Infrastructure, We are all Partners in Education, Engaging Pathway for Experienced Teachers, and Challenges. Insights gained from this inquiry will have implications for professional practices in the areas of school-university partnership, professional development, and action research process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document