Hypofibrinogenemia and disseminated intravascular coagulation rarely complicate treatment-naïve acute lymphoblastic leukemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (10) ◽  
pp. 2497-2501
Author(s):  
Charles Gaulin ◽  
Angela Chan ◽  
Andriy Derkach ◽  
Jae H. Park ◽  
Simon Mantha ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 1305-1310 ◽  
Author(s):  
AH Sarris ◽  
S Kempin ◽  
E Berman ◽  
J Michaeli ◽  
C Little ◽  
...  

Abstract We determined the incidence and complications of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) at presentation and during remission induction of previously untreated adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or de novo Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL (PCALL) seen at Memorial Hospital between January 1, 1978 and December 31, 1989. DIC was diagnosed in the presence of (1) low fibrinogen (less than or equal to 160 mg/dL), (2) prolonged prothrombin time (PT) and falling fibrinogen, or (3) prolonged PT and positive fibrin split products (FSP). L-Asparaginase was not used during remission induction. Among adequately screened patients with ALL, DIC was detected in 7 of 58 (12%) before initiation of chemotherapy and in 35 of 45 (78%) during remission induction. DIC was not simply the result of infection because clinical and laboratory signs of infection were absent in 16 patients, whereas only 2 of the 22 febrile patients with DIC had positive cultures. Among the 38 patients with DIC at presentation or during remission induction, serious complications were seen in 13 in temporal association with DIC (pulmonary embolus in one, sagittal sinus thrombosis in three, and serious hemorrhage in nine) and were major factors in the deaths of three patients. Among the 10 patients with thorough screening but no evidence of DIC there was only one hemorrhage during the same time interval. In patients with PCALL, DIC was detected in 9% at presentation and in 80% during remission induction. We conclude that DIC is rare at presentation but common during remission induction of adult ALL and PCALL and may be associated with significant thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications. We suggest daily screening for DIC during the first 14 days of remission induction. The treatment of DIC in ALL and PCALL should be a subject of future clinical studies.


Blood ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 1305-1310
Author(s):  
AH Sarris ◽  
S Kempin ◽  
E Berman ◽  
J Michaeli ◽  
C Little ◽  
...  

We determined the incidence and complications of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) at presentation and during remission induction of previously untreated adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or de novo Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL (PCALL) seen at Memorial Hospital between January 1, 1978 and December 31, 1989. DIC was diagnosed in the presence of (1) low fibrinogen (less than or equal to 160 mg/dL), (2) prolonged prothrombin time (PT) and falling fibrinogen, or (3) prolonged PT and positive fibrin split products (FSP). L-Asparaginase was not used during remission induction. Among adequately screened patients with ALL, DIC was detected in 7 of 58 (12%) before initiation of chemotherapy and in 35 of 45 (78%) during remission induction. DIC was not simply the result of infection because clinical and laboratory signs of infection were absent in 16 patients, whereas only 2 of the 22 febrile patients with DIC had positive cultures. Among the 38 patients with DIC at presentation or during remission induction, serious complications were seen in 13 in temporal association with DIC (pulmonary embolus in one, sagittal sinus thrombosis in three, and serious hemorrhage in nine) and were major factors in the deaths of three patients. Among the 10 patients with thorough screening but no evidence of DIC there was only one hemorrhage during the same time interval. In patients with PCALL, DIC was detected in 9% at presentation and in 80% during remission induction. We conclude that DIC is rare at presentation but common during remission induction of adult ALL and PCALL and may be associated with significant thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications. We suggest daily screening for DIC during the first 14 days of remission induction. The treatment of DIC in ALL and PCALL should be a subject of future clinical studies.


2002 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Dahéron ◽  
Françoise Brizard ◽  
Frédéric Millot ◽  
Marie Cividin ◽  
Laurence Lacotte ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 1169-1176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takakazu Higuchi ◽  
Daisuke Toyama ◽  
Yasuzou Hirota ◽  
Keiichi Isoyama ◽  
Hiraku Mori ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1217-1217
Author(s):  
Charles Gaulin ◽  
Angela Chan ◽  
Mark Blaine Geyer ◽  
Jae H. Park ◽  
Simon Mantha ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Hypofibrinogenemia (HF) in acute leukemia has largely been attributed to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Pathological alterations in hemostasis through various mechanisms by circulating leukemia cells have been implicated in the pathogenesis of DIC, particularly in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) (Tallman et al., Leuk Lymphoma, 1993). In adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), DIC is rare at presentation, but is significantly more common during induction chemotherapy, with varying degrees of reported morbidity and mortality (Higuchi et al., Leuk Lymphoma, 2005; Sarris et al., Leuk Lymphoma, 1996). Conversely, hyperfibrinogenemia at presentation has also been observed, possibly due to increased synthesis as an acute phase reactant in the setting of inflammation (Al-Mondhiry H et al., Cancer, 1975). Discrepant reports in plasma fibrinogen levels and potentially serious hemostatic complications led us to investigate the incidence of HF and DIC among adults with untreated ALL at our center. Methods: Using a DataLine search and ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes (204.00, 204.01, 204.02, C91.00, C91.01, C91.02), all patients aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of ALL treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) between August 30, 1989 and April 27, 2018 were retrospectively identified. HF was defined as a fibrinogen level < 190 mg/dL. The diagnosis of DIC was made using the scoring system for overt DIC from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (Toh et al., J Thromb Haemost, 2007). Patients who received any chemotherapy, including asparaginase and glucocorticoids, or who had a potential alternative cause of acquired HF such as sepsis or significant liver disease prior to their initial encounter were excluded. Data collection was approved by the MSKCC Institutional Review Board. Results: A total of 275 adult patients with treatment-naive ALL were identified. The median age at presentation was 44 years. The study population consisted of 122 patients with B-ALL, 81 with T-ALL and 72 with ALL of unspecified lineage. Of these, 187 had a fibrinogen level obtained prior to initiation of therapy. Eight patients (4.3%) had HF at initial assessment with a mean level of 141 mg/dL. Of these 8 patients, 5 had B-ALL, 2 had T-ALL and 1 had ALL of unspecified lineage. Four of these 8 patients required fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and/or cryoprecipitate during their hospitalization for prevention of overt coagulopathy. Three of the 4 patients who required FFP and/or cryoprecipitate went on to receive an asparaginase containing induction regimen. One patient with B-ALL met criteria for overt DIC without clinical complications. One patient with HF experienced WHO grade 2 epistaxis and hematochezia. No deaths in our study population were attributable to DIC at presentation. Discussion: Our study demonstrated that HF and DIC in treatment-naive ALL are uncommon. The rare incidence of DIC in our population is consistent with prior studies in adult ALL (Sarris et al., Blood, 1992). Our findings are also similar to those reported in patients with non-APL acute myeloid leukemia (Weltermann et al., Leukemia, 1998). In contrast, most patients with APL exhibit HF (Lou et al., Leuk Res, 2016). Proposed mechanisms of coagulopathy in APL include primary activation of fibrinolysis, as well as expression of tissue factor and cancer procoagulant by the malignant promyelocytes themselves; these mechanisms appear to be significantly less prevalent in ALL (Breen et al., Br J Haematol, 2012). DIC, when present at initial assessment, is generally subclinical and seldom leads to morbidity and mortality. Although the incidence of HF and DIC was low at diagnosis in our study population, we recommend pre-treatment screening for DIC to identify patients with overt coagulopathy at presentation and to establish baseline values, given the risk of coagulopathic complications during induction chemotherapy for ALL, particularly among patients receiving asparaginase products (Truelove et al., Leukemia, 2012). Further characterization of the ALL microenvironment in patients developing HF and DIC may elucidate mechanisms of procoagulant expression and increased fibrinolysis in this subgroup. Assessing predictors and clinical implications of baseline HF in adults with ALL in a larger series may help to guide early supportive management. Disclosures Geyer: Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Park:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mantha:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Heidell, Pittoni, Murphy & Bach, LLP: Consultancy; GLG: Consultancy. Tallman:Orsenix: Other: Advisory board; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory board; Cellerant: Research Funding; BioSight: Other: Advisory board; AROG: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2500-2500
Author(s):  
Ryota Imanaka ◽  
Taiichi Kyo ◽  
Kayo Toishigawa ◽  
Tetsuro Ochi ◽  
Takeshi Okatani ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) occurs about 10% of adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) at presentation, and develops in approximately 30-40% of adult patients after starting induction therapy. Although reports of DIC developing with a high frequency in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL are scarce, we have experienced many cases of DIC in Ph+ ALL patients. We start chemotherapy and prednisolone (PSL) at the same time after diagnosis of ALL, and give imatinib (IM) at the time it is found to be Ph+. However, we have experienced cases of early death due to severe DIC and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) when utilizing this approach. Therefore, we have tried mild tumor reduction via initiation of PSL, IM and chemotherapy at different times. We investigated the difference in the incidence of DIC between Ph+ ALL patients and Ph negative (Ph-) ALL patients and discuss the management of DIC and its effect. Patients and methods We examined ALL patients who received their first treatment at our institution between January 2012 and December 2014. We monitored for DIC by twice daily blood testing, and diagnosed DIC according to the diagnostic criteria for DIC of the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. When DIC developed, the patients were encouraged to rest, and we treated DIC with recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rTM) and/or gabexate mesylsate (FOY). To prevent bleeding episodes, platelet (Plt) and fresh frozen plasma transfusion were given to maintain Plt count >50,000/ul and fibrinogen (Fib) level >100 mg/dl. For induction therapy, to avoid rapid development of DIC and TLS, we first administered PSL 60 mg/m2. While confirming a decrease in leukocyte counts and fibrin degradation products (FDP), we started IM followed by chemotherapy (daunorubicin + vincristine + cyclophosphamide + L-asparaginase) in Ph+ ALL patients. We began PSL followed by the same chemotherapy in Ph- ALL patients as well. We used rasburicase to prevent TLS. Results A total of 35 patients with newly diagnosed ALL were examined: 18 patients were Ph+ and 17 were Ph-. The incidence of DIC was 82.3% (14/17) in Ph+ patients and 38.9% (7/18) in Ph- patients. The group with Ph+ showed a significantly higher rate of DIC (p value = 0.015). Duration of the treatment of DIC was 4-14 days (median, 10 days) in Ph+ patients, and 3-10 days (median, 5 days) in Ph- patients. The group with Ph+ also showed significantly longer duration of treatment (p value = 0.02). Twelve Ph+ patients developed DIC (two patients were excluded because of treatment that was different from that described above); five were men and seven were women. Median age was 61 years (range, 34-78 years). Leukocyte counts at the time of diagnosis were 4400-542100 /ul (median 34400 /ul), hemoglobin value was 6.4-15.6 g/dl (median 11.6, g/dl), Plt counts were 6000-262000 /ul (median, 56000 /ul), Fib value was 199-707 mg/dl (median, 299 mg/dl), and FDP value was 3.4-45.7 ug/ml (median, 9.7 ug/ml). DIC occurred at 1-8 days (median, 3 days) from diagnosis. One patient (8%) had DIC at presentation, and the remaining 11 patients (92%) had DIC after the initiation of induction therapy. We started IM at day 3-6 (median, day 5), DIC developed in two patients starting IM, and chemotherapy was started at day 5-10 (median, day 7). Only one patient had slight elevation of FDP, and this value decreased in a progressive fashion in the remaining 11 patients. The maximum FDP value during the treatment of DIC was 32-1162.8 ug/ml (median, 140 ug/ml). We treated DIC with FOY single agent (one patient) or a combination of rTM and FOY (10 patients); all patients showed improvement. The period for improvement of DIC was 4-14 days (median, 8 days), and none of the patients had bleeding or organ damage. Only one patient had TLS, but it immediately improved. In these Ph+ patients, 11/12 patients (92%) achieved complete remission (CR), and one patient had partial remission. Further, 5/5 patients (100%) achieved CR, and none had TLS in the group with Ph-. Conclusion DIC occurred at a high incidence in Ph+ ALL patients. By starting PSL, IM, and chemotherapy at the right time, we can perform induction therapy without generating serious complication due to DIC. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document