Comparing Occupational Health and Safety Management System Programming with Injury Rates in Poultry Production

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 364-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Autenrieth ◽  
William J. Brazile ◽  
David I. Douphrate ◽  
Ivette N. Román-Muñiz ◽  
Stephen J. Reynolds
2016 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 108-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Autenrieth ◽  
William J. Brazile ◽  
Delvin R. Sandfort ◽  
David I. Douphrate ◽  
Ivette N. Román-Muñiz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A66.1-A66
Author(s):  
Chris McLeod ◽  
Robert Macpherson ◽  
Adebayo Aderounmu ◽  
Willianm Quirke ◽  
Mieke Koehoorn

ObjectivesTo determine if achieving an audit-based occupational health and safety management system certification (OHSMS) is associated with lower firm-level lost-time injury rates.MethodsFirm-level workers’ compensation claims and OHSMS audit data were extracted from eligible industry sectors for the years 2000 to 2015. OHSMS and non-OHSMS firms were matched on observable baseline characteristics using coarsened exact matching methods. A difference-in-difference observational research design using population-averaged negative binomial regression models estimated the effect (incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals) of OHSMS certification on firm lost-time injury rates, adjusting for confounders. Models were stratified by industry sector and type of OHSMS (certification for small versus large firms).ResultsThe cohort included 14,377 OHSMS firms matched to 11 338 non-OHSMS firms. Overall, OHSMS certification reduced lost time injuries (IRR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.83–0.88), with a greater effect in 2011–15 (IRR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.75–0.82). OHSMS certification was most effective in reducing injuries in the manufacturing (IRR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.70–0.80), trade (IRR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.73–0.86), and transportation (IRR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72–0.89) sectors. No effect was found in oil and gas (IRR: 1.05, 95% CI 0.91–1.20), business (IRR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.89–1.10) and forestry (IRR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.83–1.33) sectors. OHSMS certification for small firms was not associated with a reduction in injuries (IRR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.91–1.06.) in contrast to OHSMS certification for large firms (IRR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.82–0.87).ConclusionsOHSMS certification is effective in reducing firm injury rates. Effectiveness varied by sector, time period, and small or large firm certification. Sectoral differences in OHSMS effectiveness suggest that the ability to prevent hazards targeted by certification may vary by work environment. Further, small firm OHSMS certification may not be identifying safer firms.


2007 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 329-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynda S. Robson ◽  
Judith A. Clarke ◽  
Kimberley Cullen ◽  
Amber Bielecky ◽  
Colette Severin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 328 ◽  
pp. 10008
Author(s):  
Edward Rizky Ahadian ◽  
Siti Qamaria Rumaru ◽  
Muhammad Darwis ◽  
Erwinsyah Tuhuteru

In a construction project there are various problems that occur, one of which is the problem regarding the occupational Occupational Health and Safety Management System (OHSMS) which must always be considered. The research location is located in the city of Ternate, North Maluku province. This study aims to determine which constraint variable has the most influence based on the perception of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) experts. The method used is the Analytical Hierarchy Process method through the distribution of questionnaires and interviews with several construction companies. Based on the results of the AHP analysis, the rankings of the constraint variables are as follows: no evaluation related to OHS for workers in the field (0.2312), low culture (0.2277), no punishment for workers who do not carry out OHS in the field (0.1486).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document