Large eddy simulations without explicit eddy viscosity models

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 435-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Domaradzki
Author(s):  
Steffen Stolz

Eddy-viscosity models such as the Smagorinsky model [1] are the most often employed subgrid-scale (SGS) models for large-eddy simulations (LES). However, for a correct prediction of the viscous sublayer of wall-bounded turbulent flows van-Driest wall damping functions or a dynamic determination of the constant [2] have to be employed. Alternatively, high-pass filtered (HPF) quantities can be used instead of the full velocity field for the computation of the subgrid-scale model terms. This approach has been independently proposed by Vreman [3] and Stolz et al. [4]. In this contribution we consider LES of a spatially developing supersonic turbulent boundary layer at a Mach number of 2.5 and momentum-thickness Reynolds numbers at inflow of approximately 4500, using the HPF Smagorinsky model. The model is supplemented by a HPF eddy-diffusivity ansatz for the SGS heat flux in the energy equation. Turbulent inflow conditions are generated by a rescaling and recycling technique proposed by [5] where the mean and fluctuating part of the turbulent boundary layer at some distance downstream of inflow is rescaled and reintroduced at inflow.


2005 ◽  
Vol 127 (4) ◽  
pp. 666-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Stolz

In this contribution we consider large-eddy simulation (LES) using the high-pass filtered (HPF) Smagorinsky model of a spatially developing supersonic turbulent boundary layer at a Mach number of 2.5 and momentum-thickness Reynolds numbers at inflow of ∼4500. The HPF eddy-viscosity models employ high-pass filtered quantities instead of the full velocity field for the computation of the subgrid-scale (SGS) model terms. This approach has been proposed independently by Vreman (Vreman, A. W., 2003, Phys. Fluids, 15, pp. L61–L64) and Stolz et al. (Stolz, S., Schlatter, P., Meyer, D., and Kleiser, L., 2003, in Direct and Large Eddy Simulation V, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 81–88). Different from classical eddy-viscosity models, such as the Smagorinsky model (Smagorinsky, J., 1963, Mon. Weath. Rev, 93, pp. 99–164) or the structure-function model (Métais, O. and Lesieur, M., 1992, J. Fluid Mech., 239, pp. 157–194) which are among the most often employed SGS models for LES, the HPF eddy-viscosity models do need neither van Driest wall damping functions for a correct prediction of the viscous sublayer of wall-bounded turbulent flows nor a dynamic determination of the coefficient. Furthermore, the HPF eddy-viscosity models are formulated locally and three-dimensionally in space. For compressible flows the model is supplemented by a HPF eddy-diffusivity ansatz for the SGS heat flux in the energy equation. Turbulent inflow conditions are generated by a rescaling and recycling technique in which the mean and fluctuating part of the turbulent boundary layer at some distance downstream of inflow is rescaled and reintroduced at the inflow position (Stolz, S. and Adams, N. A., 2003, Phys. Fluids, 15, pp. 2389–2412).


1998 ◽  
Vol 356 ◽  
pp. 327-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
CARLOS HÄRTEL ◽  
LEONHARD KLEISER

A numerical study of turbulent channel flow at various Reynolds numbers (Reτ=115, 210, 300) is conducted in order to examine the requirements for a reliable subgrid modelling in large-eddy simulations of wall-bounded flows. Using direct numerical simulation data, the interactions between large and small scales in the near-wall flow are analysed in detail which sheds light on the origin of the inverse cascade of turbulent kinetic energy observed in the buffer layer. It is shown that the correlation of the wall-normal subgrid stress and the wall-normal derivative of the streamwise grid-scale velocity plays the key role in the occurrence of the inverse cascade. A brief a priori test of several subgrid models shows that currently applied models are not capable of accounting properly for the complex interactions in the near-wall flow. A series of large-eddy simulations gives evidence that this deficiency may cause significant errors in important global quantities of the flow such as the mean wall shear stress. A study of the eddy-viscosity ansatz is conducted which reveals that the characteristic scales usually employed for the definition of the eddy viscosity are inappropriate in the vicinity of a wall. Therefore, a novel definition of the eddy viscosity is derived from the analysis of the near-wall energy budget. This new definition, which employs the wall-normal subgrid stress as a characteristic scale, is more consistent with the near-wall physics. No significant Reynolds-number effects are encountered in the present analysis which suggests that the findings may be generalized to flows at higher Reynolds numbers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document