scholarly journals Alleviating Anxiety and Cultivating Care: Young Trans People in the Family Court of Australia

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-130
Author(s):  
Senthorun Raj
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Emily Blincoe

<p>Section 28 of the Births, Deaths, Marriages, and Relationships Registration Act 1995 allows people to apply to the Family Court to change the sex marker on their birth certificate. This essay argues that this provision is out-dated and does not serve the needs of the trans community. It is based on the medical model of sex, and requires medical evidence that the applicant’s body conforms sufficiently to that of the “nominated sex”. This essay suggests a reform based on the self-identification model, which exists in Argentina for birth certificates, and in New Zealand for passports and drivers’ licences. Such a reform of s 28 would bring birth certificates in line with these other documents, leading to more consistency and increased respect for the human rights of trans people.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Emily Blincoe

<p>Section 28 of the Births, Deaths, Marriages, and Relationships Registration Act 1995 allows people to apply to the Family Court to change the sex marker on their birth certificate. This essay argues that this provision is out-dated and does not serve the needs of the trans community. It is based on the medical model of sex, and requires medical evidence that the applicant’s body conforms sufficiently to that of the “nominated sex”. This essay suggests a reform based on the self-identification model, which exists in Argentina for birth certificates, and in New Zealand for passports and drivers’ licences. Such a reform of s 28 would bring birth certificates in line with these other documents, leading to more consistency and increased respect for the human rights of trans people.</p>


2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Emily Blincoe

Section 28 of the Births, Deaths, Marriages, and Relationships Registration Act 1995 allows people to apply to the Family Court to change the sex marker on their birth certificate. This article argues that this provision is outdated and does not go far enough in providing legal recognition for trans people. It is based on the medical model of sex, and requires medical evidence that the applicant's body conforms sufficiently to that of the "nominated sex". The major problem with this requirement is that the required medical interventions are unavailable or undesirable for many trans people, so should not be a basis for legal recognition. The medical model also privileges medical and judicial expertise above a person's own identity and experience. This article suggests a reform based on the self-identification model, which exists in Argentina for birth certificates, and in New Zealand for passports and drivers' licences. Such a reform of s 28 would bring birth certificates in line with these other documents, leading to more consistency and increased respect for the human rights of trans people.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document