Consolidation with a short course of daratumumab in patients with AL amyloidosis or light chain deposition disease

Amyloid ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Efstathios Kastritis ◽  
Pantelis Rousakis ◽  
Ioannis V. Kostopoulos ◽  
Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽  
Foteini Theodorakakou ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7035-7035
Author(s):  
Al-Ola A. Abdallah ◽  
Shebli Atrash ◽  
Aziz Bakhous ◽  
Daisy Alapat ◽  
Maurizio Zangari

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4767-4767
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Zonder ◽  
Christiane Houde ◽  
Sascha Tuchman ◽  
Vishal Kukreti ◽  
Vaishali Sanchorawala ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: AL amyloidosis (AL) and Light Chain Deposition Disease (LCDD) are plasma cell dyscrasias in which misfolded monoclonal light chains form insoluble extracellular protein deposits (fibrillar and amorphous, respectively). In AL particularly, toxic soluble light chain oligomers also play a role in disease pathogenesis. Treatment of AL and LCDD aims at eliminating the abnormal plasma cell clone. Typical agents used include corticosteroids, bortezomib (btz), alkylators, or immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) such as lenalidomide (len) or pomalidomide (pom). Len-btz-dexamethasone (dex) is a highly efficacious frontline regimen commonly used for multiple myeloma, a related plasma cell cancer. Despite this, prospective studies using btz-IMiD combos as initial therapy of AL or LCDD are lacking. Here we report our experience with pom-btz-dex(PVD) for pts with AL or LCDD. Methods: This is a prospective Phase I trial using a standard 3+3 dose escalation scheme (described in Table 1). The primary objective is to establish the maximally tolerated dosing (MTD), with assessment for dose limiting toxicity (DLT) extending through cycles 1 and 2 for each pt. Hematologic and organ responses (HR and OR) were assessed using recently updated guidelines. PVD was administered in repeating 28-day cycles until either DLT or progressive disease. Key inclusion/exclusion criteria: biopsy proven AL amyloidosis or LCDD; no more than 1 prior cycle of anti-plasma cell therapy; measurable disease defined as at least a 5 mg/dL difference between the involved (iFLC) and uninvolved (uFLC) serum free light chains, or a serum M-protein of 0.5 g/dL or greater (latter not permissible without measurable sFLCdifference after protocol amendment); ECOG PS of 2 or less; adequate renal, hepatic, and marrow function; no Grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy (PN; pts with painful grade 2 PN also excluded). Abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction or cardiac biomarkers allowed, but pts with NYHA class III/IV congestive heart failure or uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias were excluded. Antithrombotic/antiviral prophylaxis was required for all pts. Results: Six pts have been enrolled thus far (3 each in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively). Three additional pts have already been identified for cohort 3. Five of 6 pts had AL, and 1 had LCDD. Median age was 65.5 yrs (range 49-74 yrs). 5 pts were female. Mayo cardiac stage I/II/III in 1, 2, and 3 pts, respectively. Three pts had one prior cycle of therapy (the others had none). The iFLC was lambda type in all 5 AL pts, and kappa for the pt with LCDD. Median number of organs involved by AL/LCDD was 2 (range, 2-4; 4 with both cardiac and renal, and 1 additional pt with cardiac). The median number of PVD cycles administered was 3 (range 1-6). Two pts are still on therapy. The reasons for stopping PVD in the other 4 pts were: sudden death due to underlying cardiac AL (during cycle 3 of PVD), pt preference after reaching maximal HR (after cycle 6), lack of HR (after cycle 3), and toxicity (after cycle 4). Baseline dex dose adjustment was required for protocol-specified reasons in all pts. One pt required further dex reduction during cycle 4 of PVD. No pts required baseline or subsequent modification of pom or btz. Table 2 summarizes reported adverse events (AEs). No DLTshave been observed. Two pts achieved HR (0 CR, 1 VGPR, 1 PR, 3 SD, 0 PD). Organ responses have not been observed, but the first protocol-specified OR assessment takes place after 4 cycles of PVD and some pts have yet to reach this time point. Conclusions: PVD was well tolerated in this group of pts with AL and LCDD. Importantly, no significant myelosuppression or PN was noted in the first 2 (out of a planned 4) dose cohorts. Most AEs have been related to the ptsÕ underlying AL/LCDD, though dex has posed difficulties for some pts. Hematologic responses have been seen, but organ responses are predictably lagging. Once the MTD is established, an 18-pt expansion cohort dosed at that level willfurther examine the efficacy of PVD as up-front treatment for AL and LCDD. Disclosures Zonder: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Pomalidomide and Bortezomib are approved drugs for multiple myeloma; they are used in this trial as treatment for the related plasma cell dyscrasias AL amyloidosis and light chain deposition disease. . Tuchman:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria. Burt:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Matous:Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.


2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef Finsterer ◽  
Romana Höftberger ◽  
Claudia Stöllberger ◽  
Adelheid Wöhrer ◽  
Heinz Regele

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 1870-1893
Author(s):  
Guillermo A. Herrera ◽  
Jiamin Teng ◽  
Elba A. Turbat-Herrera ◽  
Chun Zeng ◽  
Luis del Pozo-Yauner

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1128-1133
Author(s):  
Al-Ola A Abdallah ◽  
Daisy Alapat ◽  
Varinder Kaur ◽  
Shebli Atrash

Introduction Cardiac amyloidosis and light chain deposition disease (LCDD) are the most common cause of death in AL amyloidosis or LCDD. Methods Our multiple myeloma database identified 50 patients with cardiac amyloidosis or LCDD between January 2004 and January 2013. Descriptive analyses were performed on available data for patient characteristics, disease course, and outcomes. Results The median age at diagnosis was 61 years for those who received autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (ASCT) and 71 years for those who received only bortezomib-based chemotherapy; 62.5% (n = 30) of patients had elevated levels of NT-proBNP ≥323 ng/L, and 29.2% (n = 14) of patients had an elevated cTnT ≥0.1 µg/L. Echocardiogram findings showed a speckled appearance in 18% (n = 9) of patients, and 60% (n = 30) of patients had an increased diastolic intra-ventricular septum (IVSD) thickness measuring ≥1.3 cm; 64.3% (n = 18) of patients who underwent cardiac MRI showed subendocardial enhancement. Out of 48 patients who received treatment, 37 patients were diagnosed with cardiac amyloidosis and 11 patients were diagnosed with cardiac LCDD. Twenty-eight patients (75.7%) with cardiac amyloidosis received ASCT, compared to 34.3% (n = 9) patients who were ineligible for ASCT and received chemotherapy only. Patients who underwent ASCT had a median OS of 4.48 years compared to 1.82 years (p = 0.69) for those receiving chemotherapy alone. Conclusion Our single institution experience shows that ASCT is feasible for cardiac amyloidosis and/or cardiac LCDD. However, careful selection of proper patients and diligent supportive care are vital to decreasing transplant-related mortality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document