Somatostatin-derived amyloidosis: a novel type of amyloidosis associated with well-differentiated somatostatin-producing neuroendocrine tumours

Amyloid ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Van Treeck ◽  
Surendra Dasari ◽  
Paul J. Kurtin ◽  
Jason D. Theis ◽  
Samih H. Nasr ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Dafnis ◽  
Haseem Raja ◽  
Bipasha Chakrabarty ◽  
Angela Lamarca ◽  
Richard A Hubner ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S776
Author(s):  
G. Lamberti ◽  
S. Pusceddu ◽  
T. Ibrahim ◽  
A. Bongiovanni ◽  
R. Berardi ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uta Jütting ◽  
Peter Gais ◽  
Karsten Rodenacker ◽  
Joachim Böhm ◽  
Susanne Koch ◽  
...  

Neuroendocrine tumours (NET) of the lung are divided in subtypes with different malignant potential. The first is the benign or low‐grade malignant tumours, well‐differentiated, called typical carcinoids (TC) and the second is the high‐grade malignant tumours, poorly differentiated of small (SCLC) or large cell type (LCLC). Between these tumour types lies the well‐differentiated carcinoma with a lower grade of malignancy (WDNEC). In clinical routine it is very important with regard to prognosis to distinguish patients with low malignant potential from those with higher ones. In this study 32 cases of SCLC, 13 of WDNEC and 14 of TC with a follow‐up time up to 7 years were collected. Sections 4 μm thick from paraffin embedded tissue were Feulgen stained. By means of high resolution image analysis 100 nuclei per case were randomly gathered to extract morphometric, densitometric and textural quantitative features. To investigate the ploidy status of the tumour the corrected DNA distribution was calculated. Stepwise linear discriminant analysis to differentiate the classes and Cox regression analysis for the survival time analysis were applied. Using chromatin textural and morphometric features in two two‐class discriminations, 11 of the 14 TC cases and 8 of the 13 WDNEC cases were correctly classified and 11/13 WDNEC cases and 28/32 SCLC cases, respectively. The WDNEC cases are more similar in chromatin structure to TC than to SCLC. For the survival analysis, only chromatin features were selected to differentiate patients with better and worse prognosis independent of staging and tumour type.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kris G Samsom ◽  
Sonja Levy ◽  
Linde M Veenendaal ◽  
Paul Roepman ◽  
Liudmila L Kodach ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 765-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Haug ◽  
Christoph J. Auernhammer ◽  
Björn Wängler ◽  
Reinhold Tiling ◽  
Gerwin Schmidt ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S1-S16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Günter Klöppel

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are composed of cells with a neuroendocrine phenotype. The old and the new WHO classifications distinguish between well-differentiated and poorly differentiated neoplasms. All well-differentiated neoplasms, regardless of whether they behave benignly or develop metastases, will be called neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), and graded G1 (Ki67 <2%) or G2 (Ki67 2–20%). All poorly differentiated neoplasms will be termed neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and graded G3 (Ki67 >20%). To stratify the GEP-NETs and GEP-NECs regarding their prognosis, they are now further classified according to TNM-stage systems that were recently proposed by the European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS) and the AJCC/UICC. In the light of these criteria the pathology and biology of the various NETs and NECs of the gastrointestinal tract (including the oesophagus) and the pancreas are reviewed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document