Real-life cost of vitamin K antagonist treatment in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in France in 2013

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 974-981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Dallongeville ◽  
Xavier Ansolabehere ◽  
Noëlla Karusisi ◽  
Frédérique Maurel ◽  
Eric Van Ganse ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 158 (39) ◽  
pp. 1545-1549
Author(s):  
János Tomcsányi ◽  
Balázs Salfer ◽  
Bence Nagy

Abstract: Introduction: Despite a progress in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation this arrhythmia is one of the major causes of stroke, heart failure, sudden death and cardiovascular morbidity. Oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonist or non-vitamin K antagonist markedly reduces stroke and mortality in atrial fibrillation patients. Aim: To estimate the real-life vitamin K antagonist and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant treatment in past years in Hungary. Method: Analysis of the National Health Insurance Administation database for atrial fibrillation (BNO: I48) between 2010–2015. We assumed that AF patient would turn to health care provides at least once either as inpatients or outpatients in a 5-year period. The patient was accepted as adherent after 6 months therapy and at least 80% oral anticoagulant prescription. Results: The prevalence of AF in Hungary is 3%. The mortality rate of AF 7%–10% per year. The adherence of the old oral anticoagulant treatment was 55%, but it was 69% among patient treated by “new” oral anticoagulant treatment. However, one third of the patients are not treated by effective old or new oral anticoagulant treatment. Conclusions: We need more effort to improve the effective and high adherence oral anticoagulant therapy in our country. Orv Hetil. 2017; 158(39): 1545–1549.


2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 413-420
Author(s):  
Anna Rago ◽  
Enrica Pezzullo ◽  
Marco Malvezzi Caracciolo d'Aquino ◽  
Gabriella Scognamiglio ◽  
Valentina Maria Caso ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
A. CAPIAU ◽  
M. GRYMONPREZ ◽  
T. DE BACKER ◽  
S. GEVAERT ◽  
K. BOUSSERY ◽  
...  

Atrial fibrillation and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: from clinical trials to real-world clinical practice. For decades, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) were the only oral anticoagulants available for the prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Since 2012, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are available for this indication, which have proven to be at least as effective and safe as VKAs in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). NOACs have additional benefits, such as a fast onset of action, a fixed-dose regimen without requiring regular monitoring, less interactions and less intracranial bleeding. Their emergence has caused a paradigm shift in anticoagulation therapy, with NOACs being the anticoagulant of choice compared to VKAs. Since strict in- and exclusion criteria were used in the pivotal RCTs, concerns have risen regarding the generalizability of these results to real-life clinical practice in patients with multiple comorbidities. In this manuscript, this extrapolation is discussed, focusing on 4 different topics regarding appropriate NOAC use: the management of AF patients with a single stroke risk factor, the importance of an optimal therapy adherence, potential drug-drug interactions with NOACs and addressing a geriatric AF patient after a fall. Hopefully, this manuscript will help guide clinicians in the optimal use of NOACs in their daily clinical practice.


2017 ◽  
Vol 117 (02) ◽  
pp. 209-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeria Raparelli ◽  
Marco Proietti ◽  
Roberto Cangemi ◽  
Gregory Y. H. Lip ◽  
Deirdre A. Lane ◽  
...  

SummaryOral anticoagulation is pivotal in the management of thromboembolic risk in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. Effective anticoagulation is important to avoid major adverse events and medication adherence is central to achieve good anticoagulation control. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are as effective and safe as vitamin K antagonist (VKAs) in NVAF patients. Due to the absence of routine anticoagulation monitoring with NOACs treatment, concerns have been raised about patient’s adherence to NOACs and real-life data demonstrates variability in adherence and persistence. A multi-level approach, including patients’ preferences, factors determining physicians’ prescribing habits and healthcare system infrastructure and support, is warranted to improve initiation and adherence of anticoagulants. Adherence to NOACs is paramount to achieve a clinical benefit. Implementation of educational programs and easy-to-use tools to identify patients most likely to be non-adherent to NOACs, are central issues in improving the quality of NVAF anticoagulation management.Note: The review process for this manuscript was fully handled by C. Weber, Editor in Chief.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saga Itäinen‐Strömberg ◽  
Anna‐Mari Hekkala ◽  
Aapo L. Aro ◽  
Tuija Vasankari ◽  
Kari Eino Juhani Airaksinen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Marinelli ◽  
M Zoli ◽  
P Calogero ◽  
M L Lunardelli ◽  
L Bastagli

Abstract Background The 2016 and 2018 ESC guidelines for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) recommend the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in all AF patients except for the EHRA type 1, for which remains the indication to vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (VKAs). Purpose To evaluate the adherence to the ESC guidelines in the management of anticoagulant therapy (OAC) in the prevention of cardioembolism in geriatric (age ≥65) AF patients at 3 medical-geriatric inpatient wards of the Sant'Orsola Hospital in Bologna (Emilia Romagna region, Italy). Methods Between April 1st and October 1st 2018, 138 consecutive AF inpatients were prospectively enrolled at the start or at the change or at the interruption of the OAC. Results The main characteristics of the cohort were: mean age 84,6 years (range 65–102), M/F = 64/74, mean Charlson score 4,4, mean ADL/IADL 3,45/2,01 and mean CHA2DS2VASc/ HAS-BLED scores 5/3. Thirty-eight percent (N=52) of patients needed walking aids. Polypharmacy (intake of ≥5 drugs) was present in 31,9% (N=44) of patients and anemia in 50% (N=69: acute 6,5%, chronic 34,8%, mixed 8,7%). Half of the patients (N=69) presented new onset AF. Only 68% of patients (N=47) with known AF (N=69) were in OAC (37,6% in VKAs and 30,4% in NOACs). At the admission, the mean INR of AF in VKAs was 3,53 (range 1,54–10). The hospital decision on the anticoagulation in 91 patients (22 with known AF not in OAC at home, and 69 with new-onset AF), defined as “naïve” to OAC, was evaluated: 26,3% (N=24) started NOACs, 45% (N=41)VKAs, 8,7% (N=8) anticoagulant low molecular weight heparin (EBPM), and 20% (N=18) didn't start OAC. The decision was supported by consultant cardiologists and/or angiologists in 72,5% of cases (N=66). The choice of the VKAs was mainly due to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney failure. Patients who started NOACs were significantly younger than those who started VKAs (age: 78,2 vs 86,5; p<0.001) and had a better preserved renal function (Cockroft-Gault GFR: 69,6 vs 48,1 ml/min; p<0.001). However, the mean GFR of VKAs patients was clearly above the lower limit set by the guidelines. The main causes of the switching between NOACs and VKAs (N=14, 10,1%) were stroke-TIA occurrence (N=7, 57,1%) and CKD (N=4, 28,5%). OAC was definitively interrupted (N=31, 22,4%) mostly for severe clinical conditions (N=16, 51,6%) and anemia (N=7, 22,5%). Conclusions In this “real life” cohort the deviation from the ESC guidelines was 52%. According to the guidelines only 11 (26,8%) of the patients who started VKAs would have been excluded from treatment with NOACs. Our experience underlines the presence of “fear” in the use of NOACs in geriatric patients, in particular with CKD. Probably it's worth to question if the current guidelines provide reliable indications regarding the safety and manageability of the NOACs in the presence of the most common geriatric syndromes.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 42-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michela Giustozzi ◽  
Maria Cristina Vedovati ◽  
Paolo Verdecchia ◽  
Lucia Pierpaoli ◽  
Melina Verso ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document