Safety and differences between direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in the risk of post-traumatic intrathoracic bleeding after rib fractures in elderly patients

Closed chest traumas are frequent consequences of falls in the elderly. The presence of concomitant oral anticoagulant therapy can increase the risk of post-traumatic bleeding even in cases of trauma with non-severe dynamics. There is limited information about the differences between vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants in the risk of post-traumatic bleeding. To assess differences in the risk of developing intra-thoracic hemorrhages after chest trauma with at least one rib fracture caused by an accidental fall in patients over 75 years of age taking oral anticoagulant therapy. This study involved data from four emergency departments over two years. All patients on oral anticoagulant therapy and over 75 years of age who reported a closed thoracic trauma with at least one rib fracture were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into two study groups according their anticoagulant therapy. Of the 342 patients included in the study, 38.9% (133/342) were treated with direct oral anticoagulants and 61.1% (209/342) were treated with vitamin K antagonist. A total of 7% (24/342) of patients presented intrathoracic bleeding, while 5% (17/342) required surgery or died as a result for the trauma. Posttraumatic intrathoracic bleeding occurred in 4.5% (6/133) of patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants and 8.6% (18/209) of patients receiving vitamin K antagonist. Logistic regression analysis, revealed no difference in the risk of intrathoracic haemorrhages between the two studied groups. Direct oral anticoagulants therapy presents a risk of post-traumatic intrathoracic haemorrhage comparable to that of vitamin K antagonist therapy.

Cardioembolic stroke: classification of causes and prevention strategies

This literature review covers the diversity of cardioembolic stroke (CES), the heterogeneity of the embolism sources and the morphological characteristics of the embolic substrate. It is emphasized that the determination of the individual tactics of secondary prevention is based on the verification of specific cardiac causes of stroke, for convenience, stratified as pathology of chambers, heart valves and variants of paradoxical embolism (PE). It has been shown that the leading pathology of the heart chambers associated with CES is nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and left ventricular thrombosis, and the main basis for the prevention of stroke in this pathology is oral anticoagulant therapy with direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists (warfarin). The main types of heart valve pathology are prosthetic valves and rheumatic mitral stenosis. In this case, oral anticoagulant therapy also serves as the basis for secondary prevention. In the absence of the need to prescribe anticoagulants (mainly in the pathology of natural heart valves) acetylsalicylic acid is the drug of choice. In infective endocarditis (IE), the basic prevention strategies are antibiotic therapy and surgery. Surgical tactics also remain the main one for the prevention of CES in tumors of the left heart. Transcatheter closure of the patent foramen ovale and occlusion of the left atrial appendage are being introduced into the daily practice of interventional medicine in order to prevent ischemic stroke. A balanced individual approach to the patient, a targeted cardiological examination, a comprehensive analysis of clinical and instrumental data and the reasonable use of funds that have proven their effectiveness and safety in the main strategies for stroke prevention, are essential in effective prevention of CES.

286 Incidence of pocket haematoma with different anticoagulation strategies in patients undergoing cardiac implantable device implant or revision

Aims Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are known for lower bleeding risk than vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). To date, it has not been established whether in such population DOAC may offer reduction of bleeding complication in patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implant or revision (substitution, upgrade, or downgrade). We evaluated whether DOACs compared to VKAs, decrease bleeding complications at the time of CIED implant in patients with AF, requiring oral anticoagulant therapy. Methods and results We present a monocentric observational retrospective study. Patients undergoing implant, generator replacement, or upgrading/downgrading of an intracardiac device (PM, ICD, or CRT) between January 2015 and March 2021 with AF undergoing DOAC or VKA were included. The comparison of risk of clinically significant pocket hematoma at 30-days follow-up in the two-treatment group [DOAC vs. VKA and DOAC vs. VKA without low molecular weight eparin (LMWH) bridge] was performed. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis including main clinical findings was performed to test the primary endpoint. Propensity score matching analysis was performed, with inversed proportional weighted (IPW) propensity score included in the multivariate analysis. 311 patients were included, 146 (46.9%) treated with DOAC and 165 (53.1%) treated with VKA. The incidence pocket haematoma was significantly reduced in patients treated with DOAC compared with VKA (3.4% vs. 13.3%, respectively, P = 0.002), a finding confirmed on multivariate analysis (HR: 3.02, CI: 1.10–8.29, P = 0.032). The incidence of pocket haematoma in patients on DOAC vs. VKA without LMWH bridge therapy was found to be significantly higher in the latter group of patients (P = 0.033, HR: 2.93, CI: 1.01–8.49, P = 0.48). After adjusting at propensity score with IPW, DOAC use showed decreased risk of pocket haematoma (HR: 0.29, CI: 0.09–0.95, P = 0.42). Conclusions In patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing CIED implant or revision, DOAC therapy appears to be associated with lower risk of event-related pocket haematoma at 30-day follow-up, even in the absence of bridging with LWMH. Such findings are hypothesis-generating.

Hormonal Contraception and Massive Pulmonary Embolism in a COVID-19 Ambulatory Patient: A Case Report

Coronavirus 19 disease (COVID-19) presents a highly variable clinical presentation and course, ranging from asymptomatic patients to rapidly progressive, fatal pneumonia. The known heterogeneous outcomes can affect both previously healthy patients and those with significant comorbidities, who develop clinical courses with possibly more multisystemic compromise. Likewise, the development of thrombotic phenomena during the acute course of the disease is associated with complications that worsen patient prognosis. We present a case report of a 45-year-old multiparous patient with a history of overweight and chronic use of oral hormonal contraception with low doses of levonorgestrel and estradiol as the only risk factors favoring the development of thrombotic events. During her outpatient COVID-19 clinical course, she developed massive pulmonary thromboembolism resulting in secondary obstructive shock, which required pharmacological thrombolysis. At discharge, hormonal contraception was considered contraindicated, and the patient was released from our institution with continued oral anticoagulant therapy. COVID-19 infection, contraceptive hormone therapy, and overweight are known risk factors for the development of thromboembolic events. The impact of their concomitance has not been studied to date. From our experience, we discuss the impact these risk factors have when present together and invite others to report similar cases.

A retrospective study on the evaluation of the appropriateness of oral anticoagulant therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation

Background The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing, and effective anticoagulation therapy can prevent adverse events. Selecting the appropriate OAC based on patient characteristics has become a challenge. Interventions are going to be a potential area of focus. Objectives To explore the discrepancies between clinician prescriptions and recommended guidelines of oral anticoagulants (OACs) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and to provide direction for improving anticoagulation strategies for treating patients with AF. Materials and methods Data were collected from the electronic medical record system of Fuwai Yunnan Cardiovascular Hospital between July 2019 and January 2020. The suitability of prescribed OACs for patients with AF was assessed according to the Rules for Avoiding Prescription Inappropriateness, the prescribed medicine label, and any relevant antithrombotic guidelines for treating patients with AF. Results A total of 460 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 53.7% received an appropriate prescription and 46.3% received an inappropriate prescription. Of the patients who received inappropriate prescriptions, 15.4% were prescribed without the presenting appropriate indicators, 1.3% were prescribed inappropriate drug selection, and 29.6% were prescribed inappropriate drug doses. For patients prescribed without providing appropriate indicators, 2.2% had no indication for medication and 13.3% had an indication for medication, but not a specific OAC. For patients with inappropriate drug selection, 1, 5 patients were on rivaroxaban, dabigatran respectively. The distribution of NOAC doses was as follows: dabigatran standard dose (45.2%), the low dose (54.8%). Rivaroxaban standard dose (58.9%), low dose (36.8%), high dose (4.3%). A total of 44 patients (9.6%) experienced bleeding events, 12 patients (2.6%) experienced embolic events, and 7 patients experienced other adverse events after dosing. Conclusions In clinical practice, it is common for patients with AF to receive inappropriate prescriptions of OACs. Therefore there is a need to enhance anticoagulation management in patients with AF to improve the appropriate use of OACs.

Gastrointestinal Bleeding: a Cardiologist's Point of View

Oral anticoagulant therapy is widely used in different patients for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic events: in atrial fibrillation, deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, acute coronary syndrome, in the early postoperative period after orthopedic surgery. Nowadays it is possible to use vitamin K antagonists (warfarin) as well as direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC): dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban. The mai complication of any anticoagulant therapy is bleeding (gastrointestinal, intracranial, etc.), which seriously limits its usage. In this review the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) associated with oral anticoagulants intake was analyzed according to the results of both large randomized and postregistration trials. Furthermore, the effect of age on the risk of GIB development is discussed, and also aspects of the pathophysiology of gastrointestinal mucosa lesions in patients taking DOAC are considered.