scholarly journals Demographically adjusted normative data for the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test-64 item: Results from the Neuropsychological Norms for the U.S.–Mexico Border Region in Spanish (NP-NUMBRS) project

Author(s):  
María J. Marquine ◽  
David Yassai-Gonzalez ◽  
Alan Perez-Tejada ◽  
Anya Umlauf ◽  
Lily Kamalyan ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1281-1281
Author(s):  
D Yassai-Gonzalez ◽  
M J Marquine ◽  
A Perez-Tejada ◽  
A Umlauf ◽  
L Kamalyan ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) is a commonly used test of executive functioning. We aimed to generate norms on the WCST-64 item version for Spanish-speakers living in the US. Participants and Method Healthy Spanish-speakers (N=189) were recruited (Age M = 38.2, SD = 10.3, range 19-60; Education M = 10.9, SD = 4.5, range 0-20; 59.3% female) from the US-Mexico border region. Participants completed the WCST-64 as part of a larger neuropsychological battery. Spearman correlations and Wilcoxon Rank-sum tests were used to assess associations between demographic variables and raw scores. T-scores enabling demographic corrections for various WCST-64 measures (Total Errors, Perseverative Responses, Perseverative Errors, and Number of Categories Completed) were obtained using fractional polynomial equations with corrections for age, education, and gender. Uncorrected percentile scores were reported for Failures to Maintain Set. Rates of neurocognitive impairment (NCI; T < 40) were calculated by applying the newly developed norms along with published norms for non-Hispanic (NH) White and African American English-speakers. Results Older age was significantly associated with worse performance, and higher education was linked to better performance on most WCST-64 raw scores. Current norms resulted in expected rates of NCI (14-16% across measures). Applying norms for NH-Whites overestimated NCI (38-52% across measures). Applying norms for African Americans yielded NCI rates closer to what would be expected, with milder misclassifications (NCI: Total Errors = 14%, Perseverative Responses = 19%, Perseverative Errors = 10%). Conclusions Regional normative data will improve interpretation of test performance on the WCST-64 for Spanish-speakers of Mexican origin living in the US and will facilitate a more valid analysis of neuropsychological profile patterns in this population. Future research will need to explore the generalizability of these norms to other groups.


2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 397-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahar Rammal ◽  
Jessica Abi Chahine ◽  
Malak Rammal ◽  
Youssef Fares ◽  
Linda Abou Abbas

1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 363-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
LIDIA ARTIOLA i FORTUNY ◽  
ROBERT K. HEATON ◽  
DAVID HERMOSILLO

Two samples of participants from the U.S.–Mexico Borderland (N = 185) versus Spain (N = 205) were compared on 16 Spanish-language neuropsychological measures. In most measures the two samples obtained similar results. There were some significant main effects of place of birth and some significant interactions between education and place of birth. Differences between the samples diminished with increasing levels of education. Within the Borderland sample, percent of life span spent in the U.S. and bilingual status were correlated with performance in some tests. Increased percent of life span spent in the U.S. was negatively correlated with performance on a Spanish word-generation task, and positively correlated with performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Bilingual Borderland participants performed significantly better than monolingual speakers in learning a list of words. We suggest that the most likely causes for the observed interaction effects are documented regional differences in early SES-related nutrition, medical care, quality of educational experiences, and general socioeconomic conditions. (JINS, 1998, 4, 363–379.)


2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 456-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Cianchetti ◽  
Simona Corona ◽  
Maria Foscoliano ◽  
Daniela Contu ◽  
Giuseppina Sannio-Fancello

2008 ◽  
Vol 71 (10) ◽  
pp. 517-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian-Kai Shan ◽  
Ying-Sheue Chen ◽  
Ying-Chiao Lee ◽  
Tung-Ping Su

Assessment ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley N. Axelrod ◽  
Anthony M. Paolo ◽  
Elizabeth Abraham

The standard Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) was administered to a mixed clinical sample of 332 individuals. The full version was compared to the 64-card version (WCST-64) by extracting the results of the first 64 cards. Percent scores for the WCST were converted to standard scores using the normative data corrected for age and education level. Percent scores for WCST-64 were converted to standard scores using the same WCST normative data. WCST-64 scores were not comparable to those obtained from the full WCST. A breakdown of the data based on performance level found WCST-64 to be useful only with respondents obtaining five or more categories by the end of the first deck. The authors recommend caution in applying WCST manual data to the WCST-64 in the clinical setting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document