Type of drug use and risky determinants associated with fatal overdose among people who use drugs: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Bahram Armoon ◽  
Rasool Mohammadi ◽  
Ladan Fattah Moghaddam ◽  
Leila Gonabadi-Nezhad
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 86-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl A. Latkin ◽  
Rachel E. Gicquelais ◽  
Catie Clyde ◽  
Lauren Dayton ◽  
Melissa Davey-Rothwell ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Bahram Armoon ◽  
Neda SoleimanvandiAzar ◽  
Mohammad Rostami ◽  
Peter Higgs ◽  
Azadeh Bayani ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Bisson ◽  
Mayara Bastos ◽  
Jonathon R. Campbell ◽  
Didi Bang ◽  
James C. Brust ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahra Mamdani ◽  
Sophie McKenzie ◽  
Bernadette Pauly ◽  
Fred Cameron ◽  
Jennifer Conway-Brown ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Peer workers or “peers” (workers with past or present drug use experience) are at the forefront of overdose response initiatives, and their role is essential in creating safe spaces for people who use drugs (PWUD). Working in overdose response settings has benefits for peer workers but is also stressful, with lasting emotional and mental health effects. Yet, little is known about the stressors peer workers face and what interventions can be implemented to support them in their roles. Methods This project used a community-based sequential mixed-methods research design. Eight peer researcher-led focus groups (n = 31) were conducted between November 2018 and March 2019 to assess needs of peer workers. The transcripts were thematically coded and analysed using interpretative description. These results informed a survey, which was conducted (n = 50) in September 2019 to acquire quantitative data on peer workers’ perception of health, quality of life, working conditions and stressors. Frequency distributions were used to describe characteristics of participants. X2 distribution values with Yates correction were conducted to check for association between variables. Results Five themes emerged from the focus groups that point to stressors felt by peer workers: (1) financial insecurity; (2) lack of respect and recognition at work; (3) housing challenges; (4) inability to access and/or refer individuals to resources; and (5) constant exposure to death and trauma. Consistent with this, the factors that survey participants picked as one of their “top three stressors” included financial situation, work situation, and housing challenges. Conclusion Peer workers are faced with a diversity of stressors in their lives which often reflect societal stigmatization of drug use. Recognition of these systemic stressors is critical in designing interventions to ease the emotional, physical and financial burden faced by peer workers.


Author(s):  
J. M. Glanville ◽  
A. E. Perry ◽  
M. Martyn-St James ◽  
C. Hewitt ◽  
S. Swami ◽  
...  

Abstract This updated systematic review assesses the effects of pharmacological interventions for drug-using offenders. Methods Systematic review protocols and conventions of the Cochrane Collaboration were followed to identify eligible studies. Studies were pooled in a meta-analysis to assess the impact of pharmacological interventions on drug use and criminal activity. An economic appraisal was conducted. Results The search strategies identified 22 studies containing 4372 participants. Meta-analyses revealed a small statistically significant mean difference favouring pharmacological interventions relative to psychological interventions in reducing drug use and criminal activity. When comparing the drugs to one another there were no significant differences between those included (methadone versus buprenorphine, naltrexone and cyclazocine). Conclusion Overall, the findings of this review suggest that methadone and naltrexone may have some impact on reducing drug use and reincarceration. Individual pharmacological drugs had differing (generally non-significant) effects. One study identified serious adverse events. Three studies reported cost and consequences information sufficient to conduct a full economic analysis but this was not comprehensive enough to be able to make judgements across all treatment options. Full economic analyses should be encouraged. The study findings were limited mainly to male adult offenders.


Author(s):  
Yngvild Olsen ◽  
Joshua M. Sharfstein

What is harm reduction? Harm reduction is “a set of practical strategies aimed at reducing negative consequences associated with drug use.” It is also “a movement for social justice built on a belief in, and respect for, the rights of people who use drugs.”...


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document