scholarly journals Statement of Retraction: “Mothers’ Tolerance of Own and Child Distress: Associations with Discipline Practices”

Parenting ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Parenting ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-68
Author(s):  
Tamara Del Vecchio ◽  
Randi Pochtar ◽  
Olga Jablonka

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyssa Rheingold ◽  
Carla Danielson ◽  
Heidi Resnick ◽  
Shannon Self-Brown ◽  
Angela Cunningham ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 558-572
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Sobol-Kwapińska ◽  
Marek Sobol ◽  
Ewa Woźnica-Niesobska

2021 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-201
Author(s):  
D. Paul Sullins

Is the system of norms comprising traditional, natural marriage—featuring formally enacted, irrevocable, exclusive man/woman sexual union preceded by chastity—essential for children’s development and well-being, as Catholic teaching asserts? Review of an extensive body of diverse research finds that, compared to children continuously living with two parents, married parents, or their own biological parents, children in other family arrangements consistently experience lower emotional well-being, physical health, and academic achievement. Competing research has variously attributed this difference to a lack of married parents, two parents, complementary man/woman parents, or family stability, but these possibilities have not previously been studied in combination. To address this question, family structure differences and determinants of child well-being (reverse coded to show child distress) were examined using the 2008–2018 National Health Interview Surveys ( n = 82,635). Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) for child emotional problems were higher with less than two parents (AOR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.27–1.56), unmarried parents (1.46, 95% CI 1.31–1.61), unstable parents (1.55, 95% CI 1.27–1.76), or less than two biological parents (AOR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.55–2.87 for one biological parent; 4.77, 95% CI 3.95–5.77 for no biological parents). When combined in the same model, only the lack of joint biological parentage accounted for higher distress, with outcomes significantly worse without the biological father than without the biological mother (interaction AOR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.04–1.71). This evidence strongly supports the claim that maximum child development occurs only in the persistent care of both of the child’s own biological parents. Marriage benefits children primarily by ensuring such care. Implications are discussed. Summary: Children raised apart from the care of both natural parents consistently experience lower developmental outcomes. Traditional, religious marriage norms—a lifelong, exclusive sexual union between man and woman—benefit children by establishing strong conditions that promote such care. More than any other family arrangement, marriage assures to children the care of their own mom and dad.


2012 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bettie Ray Butler ◽  
Chance W. Lewis ◽  
James L. Moore III ◽  
Malcolm E. Scott

2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Oriana Linares ◽  
Daniela Montalto ◽  
Nicole Rosbruch ◽  
MinMin Li

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 303-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Cumings Mansfield ◽  
Beth Fowler ◽  
Stacey Rainbolt

The purpose of this “From the Field” article is to share the tentative results of community-engaged research investigating the impact of Restorative Justice Discipline Practices on persistent discipline gaps in terms of race, gender, and special education identification.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document