Exploring the Shift from Output Measures to Outcome Measures of Service Delivery: Insights from Municipal Research

Author(s):  
Roberta Fasiello ◽  
William C. Rivenbark ◽  
Carmine Bianchi
1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Z. Lieberman ◽  
David A. Mrazek

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Niranjan S. Karnik ◽  
Cynthia I. Campbell ◽  
Megan E. Curtis ◽  
David A. Fiellin ◽  
Udi Ghitza ◽  
...  

Abstract Background A lack of consensus on the optimal outcome measures to assess the efficacy and effectiveness of interventions for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) has hampered the pooling of research data for evidence synthesis and clinical guidelines. A core outcome set (COS) is a minimum set of outcome measures that are recommended for all studies of a particular condition. The National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) Core Outcome Set for OUD (COS-OUD) is a development study to identify core constructs, meaningful outcomes, and their optimal measurement for all efficacy and effectiveness studies of OUD treatment and service delivery. Methods/design Overseen by an expert workgroup, a modified, stepwise, e-Delphi methodology will be used to gain consensus among a panel of clinical practitioners and researchers involved in the treatment of OUD, who are members of the CTN. Sequential rounds of anonymous, online questionnaires will be used to identify, rate the importance of, and refine a core outcome set. A consensus threshold will be achieved if at least 70% of the panel rate the measure as critical for inclusion in the COS-OUD. Where consensus is not reached or there are suggestions for new measures, these will be brought forward to a further round of review prior to a consensus meeting. Products from this study will be communicated via peer-reviewed scientific journals and conferences. Discussion This initiative will develop a COS for OUD intervention trials, treatment studies, and service delivery and will support the pooling of research and clinical practice data and efforts to develop measurement-based care within the OUD treatment cascade. Trial registration http://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/1579


2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (12) ◽  
pp. 1072-1078
Author(s):  
Julie Faieta ◽  
Mark R. Schmeler ◽  
Vince J. Schiappa ◽  
Brittany N. Hand ◽  
Richard M. Schein ◽  
...  

1981 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-239
Author(s):  
Linda Goodman ◽  
Robin Kroc

This article describes a strategy used to teach sign communication to severely handicapped students in the classroom. It recommends that the speech-language pathologist adopt a consultant role in service delivery.


1999 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carole E. Johnson

Educational audiologists often must delegate certain tasks to other educational personnel who function as support personnel and need training in order to perform assigned tasks. Support personnel are people who, after appropriate training, perform tasks that are prescribed, directed, and supervised by a professional such as a certified and licensed audiologist. The training of support personnel to perform tasks that are typically performed by those in other disciplines is calledmultiskilling. This article discusses multiskilling and the use of support personnel in educational audiology in reference to the following principles: guidelines, models of multiskilling, components of successful multiskilling, and "dos and don’ts" for multiskilling. These principles are illustrated through the use of multiskilling in the establishment of a hearing aid monitoring program. Successful multiskilling and the use of support personnel by educational audiologists can improve service delivery to school-age children with hearing loss.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document