Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research in Dissemination and Implementation Science: Introduction to the Special Issue

In reviewing the rapidly growing literature on the use of mixed methods to address important issues confronting the science of dissemination and implementation, the authors make two observations. The first observation is that mixed methods reflect an iterative process of data collection and analysis that involves both inductive and deductive approaches to understanding complex phenomena. Second, this chapter begins with the observation that using mixed methods is more than parallel play involving separate quantitative and qualitative studies. Both the iterative nature of dissemination and implementation science and the likely debate and compromises involved in selection and application of quantitative and qualitative methods in a mixed method design demand attention on the part of the investigators to document and detail the rationale for the selection of methods and the process and outcomes of their use.

Download Full-text

Advances in Applying Treatment Integrity Research for Dissemination and Implementation Science: Introduction to Special Issue

Clinical Psychology Science and Practice ◽

10.1111/cpsp.12019 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

pp. 1-13 ◽

Cited By ~ 24

Author(s):

Michael A. Southam-Gerow ◽

Bryce D. McLeod

Keyword(s):

Implementation Science ◽

Treatment Integrity ◽

Dissemination And Implementation ◽

Special Issue ◽

Dissemination And Implementation Science

Download Full-text

Adaptation in Dissemination and Implementation Science

10.1093/oso/9780190683214.003.0017 ◽

2017 ◽

Cited By ~ 19

Author(s):

Ana A. Baumann ◽

Leopoldo J. Cabassa ◽

Shannon Wiltsey Stirman

Keyword(s):

Implementation Science ◽

Implementation Research ◽

Implementation Strategies ◽

Dissemination And Implementation ◽

Research And Practice ◽

Implementation Outcomes ◽

Dissemination And Implementation Science ◽

Dissemination And Implementation Research

This chapter focuses on adaptations in the context of dissemination and implementation research and practice. Consistent with the existing literature, the authors recommend that adaptations be proactively and iteratively determined, strongly informed by a variety of stakeholders, and that efforts be made to carefully describe and document the nature of the adaptations and evaluate their impact on desired service, health, and implementation outcomes. While this chapter focuses on adaptations to interventions and the context of practice, the authors also note that adaptations may need to be made to implementation strategies. Following the call by Proctor and colleagues for further precision in defining and operationalizing implementation strategies, and based on evidence that scholars are not necessarily reporting what and how they are adapting the interventions, scholars are urged to define and evaluate the adaptations they are making not only to the interventions and context of practice but also to the implementation strategies.

Download Full-text