dissemination and implementation science
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

53
(FIVE YEARS 25)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2022 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bethany M. Kwan ◽  
Ross C. Brownson ◽  
Russell E. Glasgow ◽  
Elaine H. Morrato ◽  
Douglas A. Luke

Designing for dissemination and sustainability (D4DS) refers to principles and methods for enhancing the fit between a health program, policy, or practice and the context in which it is intended to be adopted. In this article we first summarize the historical context of D4DS and justify the need to shift traditional health research and dissemination practices. We present a diverse literature according to a D4DS organizing schema and describe a variety of dissemination products, design processes and outcomes, and approaches to messaging, packaging, and distribution. D4DS design processes include stakeholder engagement, participatory codesign, and context and situation analysis, and leverage methods and frameworks from dissemination and implementation science, marketing and business, communications and visual arts, and systems science. Finally, we present eight recommendations to adopt a D4DS paradigm, reflecting shifts in ways of thinking, skills and approaches, and infrastructure and systems for training and evaluation. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Public Health, Volume 43 is April 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.


Kidney360 ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 10.34067/KID.0005662021
Author(s):  
Megan A Urbanski ◽  
Adam S Wilk ◽  
Cam Escoffrey ◽  
Rachel E Patzer

This is an Early Access article. Please select the PDF button, above, to view it.


2021 ◽  
pp. 101620
Author(s):  
Chelsey R. Schlechter ◽  
Guilherme Del Fiol ◽  
Cho Y. Lam ◽  
Maria E. Fernandez ◽  
Tom Greene ◽  
...  

JAMA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 326 (4) ◽  
pp. 311
Author(s):  
Ankeet S. Bhatt ◽  
Scott D. Solomon ◽  
Muthiah Vaduganathan

Author(s):  
James W. Dearing

The main concepts of the diffusion of innovations represent a hybrid change research and practice paradigm that blends ideas that can now be found in life cycle, evolutionary, and teleological theories of social change. This chapter discusses why the paradigm developed in the ways that it did, including the shortcomings of this approach, especially for studying the role of organizations in change processes. The chapter also examines the rapid rise of dissemination and implementation science as conducted by health services and public health researchers and how those new literatures are related to diffusion. This paradigmatic evolution from descriptive and explanatory studies to intervention research utilizing diffusion concepts is a theme of this chapter, with emphases on organizational implementation of innovations, inter-organizational diffusion, external validity of innovations and how a recognition of the agency of adopters can reshape diffusion study.


2021 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berjo Dongmo Takoutsing ◽  
Chibuikem Ikwuegbuenyi ◽  
Alice Umutoni ◽  
Oloruntoba Ogunfolaji ◽  
Nourou Dine Adeniran Bankole ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-92
Author(s):  
Ross C. Brownson ◽  
Rebekah R. Jacob ◽  
Bobbi J. Carothers ◽  
David A. Chambers ◽  
Graham A. Colditz ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 155798832098018
Author(s):  
Derek M. Griffith

Men’s health equity is an area of men’s health research and practice that combines the literature on men’s health with that of health equity. More research is needed that describes how to intervene to promote men’s health equity. This introduction to the American Journal of Men’s Health special collection on promoting men’s health equity was created to feature research that describes aspects of promising interventions that (a) are population-specific approaches that consider the unique biopsychosocial factors that affect the health of socially defined populations of men; or (b) use a comparative approach to close or eliminate gaps between socially defined groups of men and women and among socially meaningful groups of men that are unnecessary, avoidable, considered unfair and unjust, and yet are modifiable. The dozen papers from across the globe included in the special collection are grouped in three areas: conceptual approaches and reviews; formative research; and evaluation findings. The papers represent a diverse array of populations under the umbrella of men’s health and a range of strategies to improve men’s health from tobacco cessation to microfinance. The collection features a range of alternative masculinities that emerge from original research by the contributors that are used in novel ways in the interventions. This editorial argues that more qualitative research is needed to evaluate the intended and unintended findings from interventions. This editorial also highlights the benefits that men’s health equity can gain from embracing dissemination and implementation science as a tool to systematically design, implement, refine, and sustain interventions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document