Dynamic response analysis of multi-span bridge-track structure system under moving loads

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Shaohui Liu ◽  
Lizhong Jiang ◽  
Wangbao Zhou ◽  
Chai Xilin ◽  
Yuntai Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Response ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Track Structure ◽  
Moving Loads ◽  
Dynamic Response Analysis ◽  
Structure System

scholarly journals Dynamic Response Analysis of Geogrid Reinforced Embankment Supported by CFG Pile Structure During a High-Speed Train Operation

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ishola Valere Loic Chango ◽  
Muhan Yan ◽  
Xianzhang Ling ◽  
Tang Liang ◽  
Ogoubi Cyriaque Assogba
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Response ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
High Speed Train ◽  
Dynamic Response Analysis ◽  
Train Operation ◽  
Cfg Pile

scholarly journals Seismic performance of a high-rise residential building model in Purwokerto, Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 192 ◽  
pp. 02002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanuar Haryanto ◽  
Buntara Sthenly Gan ◽  
Nanang Gunawan Wariyatno ◽  
Eva Wahyu Indriyati
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Response ◽  
Static Analysis ◽  
Pushover Analysis ◽  
Residential Building ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Dynamic Response Analysis ◽  
Building Model ◽  
High Rise ◽  
Drift Ratio ◽  
Linear Static Analysis

We evaluated the performance of a high-rise residential building model in Purwokerto, Indonesia due to the seismic load. The evaluation was performed based on seismic loads given in the 2002 and 2012 Indonesian National Standard (SNI) using linear static analysis, dynamic response analysis and pushover analysis. Based on the linear static analysis, the drift ratio decreased by an average of 34.42 and 32.61% for the X and Y directions respectively. Meanwhile, based on the dynamic response analysis, the drift ratio also decreased by an average of 30.74 and 27.33% for the X and Y directions respectively. In addition, the pushover analysis indicates that the performance of this high-rise residential building model is still at Immediate Occupancy (IO) level. The post-earthquake damage state in which the building remains safe to occupy, essentially retaining the pre-earthquake design strength and stiffness of the structure. The risk of life-threatening injury as a result of structural damage is very low. Although some minor structural repairs may be appropriate, these would generally not be required prior to re-occupancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document