A developmental perspective on sleep consistency: Preschool age through emerging adulthood

2022 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Laura Nicholson ◽  
Amy M. Bohnert ◽  
Stephanie J. Crowley
Keyword(s):  
Emerging Adulthood ◽  
Preschool Age ◽  
Developmental Perspective

Romantic Relationships in Emerging Adulthood: A Developmental Perspective

2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 406-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jigisha Gala ◽  
Shagufa Kapadia
Keyword(s):  
Romantic Relationships ◽  
Emerging Adulthood ◽  
Developmental Perspective

Betrayals in Emerging Adulthood: A Developmental Perspective of Infidelity

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerika C. Norona ◽  
Spencer B. Olmstead ◽  
Deborah P. Welsh
Keyword(s):  
Emerging Adulthood ◽  
Developmental Perspective

Religiosity and Intimacy with an Extradyadic Partner in Emerging Adulthood: A Developmental Perspective

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-50
Author(s):  
Jerika C. Norona ◽  
Brianna E. Pollock ◽  
Deborah P. Welsh ◽  
Jennifer Bolden
Keyword(s):  
Emerging Adulthood ◽  
Developmental Perspective

Why Did It End? Breakup Reasons of Youth of Different Gender, Dating Stages, and Ages

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 230-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeriya Bravo ◽  
Jennifer Connolly ◽  
Caroline McIsaac
Keyword(s):  
Romantic Relationships ◽  
Emerging Adulthood ◽  
Emerging Adults ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Age Dating ◽  
Developmental Perspective ◽  
Relevant Theory ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
And Gender

Romantic breakups are common among youths. Yet “why” they occur is not well understood. In adolescence and emerging adulthood, unique characteristics of romantic participation call for investigation of breakups from a developmental perspective. Our principal objective was to map out breakup reasons of adolescents and emerging adults, accounting for relevant theory and research on both age-groups. We considered the role of age, gender, and dating stage (casual vs. serious) on youths’ breakup reasons. Results revealed a five-factor scale with affiliation, intimacy, autonomy, infidelity, and status as unique factors. Consistent with theory and research, we found similarities and differences in how youths of different age, dating stage, and gender endorse these reasons. These findings are consistent with the notion that breakups stem from a failure of romantic relationships to meet youths’ emerging romantic needs, and that there is considerable continuity in these relational dimensions from adolescence into emerging adulthood.

Generational Perspectives on Emerging Adulthood

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob A. Paulsen ◽  
Moin Syed ◽  
Kali Trzesniewski ◽  
M. Brent Donnellan
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Emerging Adulthood ◽  
Emerging Adults ◽  
Historical Context ◽  
Developmental Perspective ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Extensive Discussion ◽  
The Social ◽  
Generational Changes ◽  
Nuanced Understanding

Sociologists, psychologists, and others in the social sciences generally agree that the nature of adulthood is different now from what it was 50 years ago. There is much less agreement, however, on what these changes mean for the psychological experience of emerging adults. There has been extensive discussion and debate in the academic literature and popular press about whether there have been generational changes in how young people view themselves and their place in society. This chapter explores the debate over the self-focused nature of emerging adulthood from a generational perspective, focusing on the construct of narcissism. The authors review past and current conceptualizations and measurements of narcissism, summarize the ongoing debate about the nature of young people today, discuss narcissism from a lifespan developmental perspective, and offer suggestions for future research. Throughout, the authors emphasize the historical context of narcissism and societal beliefs about young people more broadly and stress that a generational perspective must be considered alongside a developmental perspective (i.e., individual ontogenetic change) to provide a more nuanced understanding of emerging adulthood.

Biracial Testing: The Question of Clinicians' Influence on Children’s Test Performance

1977 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Ratusnik ◽  
Roy A. Koenigsknecht
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Setting ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Test Scores ◽  
Preschool Age ◽  
Speech And Language ◽  
Black And White ◽  
Drawing Test ◽  
Lower Socioeconomic ◽  
Preschool Age Children

Six speech and language clinicians, three black and three white, administered the Goodenough Drawing Test (1926) to 144 preschoolers. The four groups, lower socioeconomic black and white and middle socioeconomic black and white, were divided equally by sex. The biracial clinical setting was shown to influence test scores in black preschool-age children.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document