scholarly journals Economic evaluations of psychological treatments for common mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vimbayi Mutyambizi-Mafunda ◽  
Bronwyn Myers ◽  
Katherine Sorsdahl ◽  
Esther Chanakira ◽  
Crick Lund ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Common Mental Disorders ◽  
Economic Evaluations ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Psychological Treatments ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

scholarly journals Poverty and common mental disorders in low and middle income countries: A systematic review

2010 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 517-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Crick Lund ◽  
Alison Breen ◽  
Alan J. Flisher ◽  
Ritsuko Kakuma ◽  
Joanne Corrigall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Common Mental Disorders ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

scholarly journals Cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment for child undernutrition in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
Rebecca G Njuguna ◽  
James A Berkley ◽  
Julie Jemutai
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Productivity Loss ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Economic Evaluations ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Child Undernutrition ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Background: Undernutrition remains highly prevalent in low- and middle-income countries, with sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia accounting for majority of the cases. Apart from the health and human capacity impacts on children affected by malnutrition, there are significant economic impacts to households and service providers. The aim of this study was to determine the current state of knowledge on costs and cost-effectiveness of child undernutrition treatment to households, health providers, organizations and governments in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods:  We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed studies in LMICs up to September 2019. We searched online databases including PubMed-Medline, Embase, Popline, Econlit and Web of Science. We identified additional articles through bibliographic citation searches. Only articles including costs of child undernutrition treatment were included. Results: We identified a total of 6436 articles, and only 50 met the eligibility criteria. Most included studies adopted institutional/program (45%) and health provider (38%) perspectives. The studies varied in the interventions studied and costing methods used with treatment costs reported ranging between US$0.44 and US$1344 per child. The main cost drivers were personnel, therapeutic food and productivity loss. We also assessed the cost effectiveness of community-based management of malnutrition programs (CMAM). Cost per disability adjusted life year (DALY) averted for a CMAM program integrated into existing health services in Malawi was $42. Overall, cost per DALY averted for CMAM ranged between US$26 and US$53, which was much lower than facility-based management (US$1344). Conclusion: There is a need to assess the burden of direct and indirect costs of child undernutrition to households and communities in order to plan, identify cost-effective solutions and address issues of cost that may limit delivery, uptake and effectiveness. Standardized methods and reporting in economic evaluations would facilitate interpretation and provide a means for comparing costs and cost-effectiveness of interventions.

scholarly journals Examining the use of economic evaluations in health-related humanitarian programmes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lizna A Makhani ◽  
Valerie Moran ◽  
Zia Sadique ◽  
Neha S Singh ◽  
Paul Revill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Bibliographic Databases ◽  
Economic Evaluations ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
System Perspective ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Humanitarian Crises ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract The costly nature of health sector responses to humanitarian crises and resource constraints means that there is a need to identify methods for priority setting and long-term planning. One method is economic evaluation. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the use of economic evaluations in health-related humanitarian programmes in low- and middle-income countries. This review used peer-reviewed literature published between January 1980 and June 2018 extracted from four main electronic bibliographic databases. The eligibility criteria were full economic evaluations (which compare the costs and outcomes of at least two interventions and provide information on efficiency) of health-related services in humanitarian crises in low- and middle-countries. The quality of eligible studies is appraised using the modified 36-question Drummond checklist. From a total of 8127 total studies, 11 full economic evaluations were identified. All economic evaluations were cost-effectiveness analyses. Three of the 11 studies used a provider perspective, 2 studies used a healthcare system perspective, 3 studies used a societal perspective and 3 studies did not specify the perspective used. The lower quality studies failed to provide 7information on the unit of costs and did not justify the time horizon of costs and discount rates, or conduct a sensitivity analysis. There was limited geographic range of the studies, with 9 of the 11 studies conducted in Africa. Recommendations include greater use of economic evaluation methods and data to enhance the microeconomic understanding of health interventions in humanitarian settings to support greater efficiency and transparency and to strengthen capacity by recruiting economists and providing training in economic methods to humanitarian agencies.

scholarly journals Assessing cognition in people with severe mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of assessment measures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohannes Gebreegziabhere Haile ◽  
Kassahun Habatmu ◽  
Andualem Derese ◽  
Hetta Gouse ◽  
Stephen M. Lawrie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Measurement Properties ◽  
Severe Mental Disorders ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Brief Assessment ◽  
Low And Middle Income

Abstract Background Cognitive difficulties are common in people with severe mental disorders (SMDs) and various measures of cognition are of proven validity. However, there is a lack of systematic evidence regarding the psychometric properties of these measures in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Objective To systematically review the psychometric properties of cognitive measures validated in people with SMDs in LMICs. Methods We conducted a systematic review of the literature by searching from four electronic databases. Two authors independently screened studies for their eligibility. Measurement properties of measures in all included studies were extracted. All eligible measures were assessed against criteria set for clinical and research recommendations. Results are summarized narratively and measures were grouped by measurement type and population. Results We identified 23 unique measures from 28 studies. None of these was from low-income settings. Seventeen of the measures were performance-based. The majority (n = 16/23) of the measures were validated in people with schizophrenia. The most commonly reported measurement properties were: known group, convergent, and divergent validity (n = 25/28). For most psychometric property, studies of methodological qualities were found to be doubtful. Among measures evaluated in people with schizophrenia, Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia, Cognitive Assessment Interview, MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, and CogState Schizophrenia Battery were with the highest scores for clinical and research recommendation. Conclusions Studies included in our review provide only limited quality evidence and future studies should consider adapting and validating measures using stronger designs and methods. Nonetheless, validated assessments of cognition could help in the management and allocating therapy in people with SMDs in LMICs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document