Visual salience accelerates lexical processing and subsequent integration: an eye-movement study

Author(s):  
Yingying Wu ◽  
Zhenxing Wang ◽  
Wanru Lin ◽  
Zengyan Ye ◽  
Rong Lian
Cognition ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 208 ◽  
pp. 104547
Author(s):  
Jukka Hyönä ◽  
Timo T. Heikkilä ◽  
Seppo Vainio ◽  
Reinhold Kliegl
Keyword(s):  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e0146583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noëmi Eggenberger ◽  
Basil C. Preisig ◽  
Rahel Schumacher ◽  
Simone Hopfner ◽  
Tim Vanbellingen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Jan-Louis Kruger ◽  
Natalia Wisniewska ◽  
Sixin Liao

Abstract High subtitle speed undoubtedly impacts the viewer experience. However, little is known about how fast subtitles might impact the reading of individual words. This article presents new findings on the effect of subtitle speed on viewers’ reading behavior using word-based eye-tracking measures with specific attention to word skipping and rereading. In multimodal reading situations such as reading subtitles in video, rereading allows people to correct for oculomotor error or comprehension failure during linguistic processing or integrate words with elements of the image to build a situation model of the video. However, the opportunity to reread words, to read the majority of the words in the subtitle and to read subtitles to completion, is likely to be compromised when subtitles are too fast. Participants watched videos with subtitles at 12, 20, and 28 characters per second (cps) while their eye movements were recorded. It was found that comprehension declined as speed increased. Eye movement records also showed that faster subtitles resulted in more incomplete reading of subtitles. Furthermore, increased speed also caused fewer words to be reread following both horizontal eye movements (likely resulting in reduced lexical processing) and vertical eye movements (which would likely reduce higher-level comprehension and integration).


2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (7) ◽  
pp. 1863-1875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin R Vasilev ◽  
Fabrice BR Parmentier ◽  
Bernhard Angele ◽  
Julie A Kirkby

Oddball studies have shown that sounds unexpectedly deviating from an otherwise repeated sequence capture attention away from the task at hand. While such distraction is typically regarded as potentially important in everyday life, previous work has so far not examined how deviant sounds affect performance on more complex daily tasks. In this study, we developed a new method to examine whether deviant sounds can disrupt reading performance by recording participants’ eye movements. Participants read single sentences in silence and while listening to task-irrelevant sounds. In the latter condition, a 50-ms sound was played contingent on the fixation of five target words in the sentence. On most occasions, the same tone was presented (standard sound), whereas on rare and unexpected occasions it was replaced by white noise (deviant sound). The deviant sound resulted in significantly longer fixation durations on the target words relative to the standard sound. A time-course analysis showed that the deviant sound began to affect fixation durations around 180 ms after fixation onset. Furthermore, deviance distraction was not modulated by the lexical frequency of target words. In summary, fixation durations on the target words were longer immediately after the presentation of the deviant sound, but there was no evidence that it interfered with the lexical processing of these words. The present results are in line with the recent proposition that deviant sounds yield a temporary motor suppression and suggest that deviant sounds likely inhibit the programming of the next saccade.


2001 ◽  
Vol 103 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 167-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annelies Broerse ◽  
Esther A.E Holthausen ◽  
Robert J van den Bosch ◽  
Johan A den Boer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document