scholarly journals Global water cycle and remote sensing big data: overview, challenge, and opportunities

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaokui Cui ◽  
Xi Chen ◽  
Jinyu Gao ◽  
Binyan Yan ◽  
Guoqiang Tang ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Wan ◽  
Hongjie Xie ◽  
Emad Hasan ◽  
Yang Hong

Global water cycle dynamics involve the exchange of water and energy matter among the atmosphere, hydrosphere, geosphere, cryosphere, and biosphere [...]


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mijael Rodrigo Vargas Godoy ◽  
Rajani Kumar Pradhan ◽  
Shailendra Pratap ◽  
Akif Rahim ◽  
Yannis Markonis

<p>The knowledge of global precipitation is of crucial importance to the study of climate dynamics and the global water cycle in general. Although global precipitation climatologies have existed for some time, and their understanding has improved dramatically due to the vast amount of different data sources, their information has not been comprehensive enough due to precipitation spatial-temporal variability. Thus, ground station reports are, in some cases, not representative of the surrounding areas. Remote sensing data and model simulations complemented the traditional surface measurements and offered unprecedented coverage on a global scale. It is important to note that satellite data records are now of sufficient time frame lengths and with methods “mature” enough to develop meaningful precipitation climatologies that are able to provide information on precipitation patterns and intensities on a global scale. While data (and in some cases exploration/visualization tools as well) are widely available, each dataset comes with different spatial resolution, temporal resolution, and biases.</p><p>Consequently, this unique opportunity to obtain a robust quantification of global precipitation has been hindered by the uncertainty, already revealed in the first attempts of the unification of different data products. Herein, we present a multi-source quantification of global precipitation, focusing on the description of the underlying uncertainties. Our approach combines station (CRU, GHCN-M, PRECL, UDEL, and CPC Global), remote sensing (PERSIANN, PERSIANN-CCS, PERSIANN-CDR, GPCP, GPCP_PEN_v2.2, CMAP, and CPC-Global) and reanalysis (NCEP1, NCEP2, and 20CRv2) data products, providing an updated overview of the role of precipitation in global water cycle.</p>


1989 ◽  
Vol 289 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Tardy ◽  
R. N'Kounkou ◽  
J.-L. Probst

2007 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. S. Takle ◽  
J. Roads ◽  
B. Rockel ◽  
W. J. Gutowski ◽  
R. W. Arritt ◽  
...  

A new approach, called transferability intercomparisons, is described for advancing both understanding and modeling of the global water cycle and energy budget. Under this approach, individual regional climate models perform simulations with all modeling parameters and parameterizations held constant over a specific period on several prescribed domains representing different climatic regions. The transferability framework goes beyond previous regional climate model intercomparisons to provide a global method for testing and improving model parameterizations by constraining the simulations within analyzed boundaries for several domains. Transferability intercomparisons expose the limits of our current regional modeling capacity by examining model accuracy on a wide range of climate conditions and realizations. Intercomparison of these individual model experiments provides a means for evaluating strengths and weaknesses of models outside their “home domains” (domain of development and testing). Reference sites that are conducting coordinated measurements under the continental-scale experiments under the Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment (GEWEX) Hydrometeorology Panel provide data for evaluation of model abilities to simulate specific features of the water and energy cycles. A systematic intercomparison across models and domains more clearly exposes collective biases in the modeling process. By isolating particular regions and processes, regional model transferability intercomparisons can more effectively explore the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of predictability. A general improvement of model ability to simulate diverse climates will provide more confidence that models used for future climate scenarios might be able to simulate conditions on a particular domain that are beyond the range of previously observed climates.


Science ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 336 (6080) ◽  
pp. 455-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Durack ◽  
S. E. Wijffels ◽  
R. J. Matear

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document