Single-centre experience with intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxinA: a retrospective study of the years 2003–2012 in a Danish population

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 392-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederikke Eichner Christiansen ◽  
Torben Brøchner Pedersen ◽  
Jacob Juel ◽  
Hans Jørgen Kirkeby
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Duminda Basnayake ◽  
Abdul Wazil ◽  
Nishantha Nanayakkara ◽  
Buddhisha Mahanama ◽  
Neelakanthi Ratnatunga ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
M A Gok ◽  
C J Smart ◽  
M M Sadat ◽  
S J Ward ◽  
U A Khan

Abstract Aims ERAS employs a multi-modal rehabilitation aids post-op recovery following colorectal resections. ERAS applied in both laparoscopic + open surgery. This study aims to assess effectiveness of ERAS at a single centre. Methods A retrospective study at East Cheshire NHS Trust, since 2008. Descriptive demography & post-operative features were collected for all elective colorectal resections. Results Conclusion ERAS associated with longer operative time (p < 0.05) (laparoscopic surgery), a shorter hospital stay was achieved (p < 0.05). Delayed ERAS occurred in 26.2 % of cases & can result in delayed discharge. Early ERAS deviations occurred in the presence of major surgical complications (ileus, anastomotic leaks, collections). Despite post-operative cardiac & pulmonary events, ERAS was maintained. A targeted rehabilitation programme especially in the elderly patients can lead to earlier recovery. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. S309
Author(s):  
D. BASNAYAKE ◽  
B. Mahanama ◽  
B. Thangarajah ◽  
M. Wazil ◽  
N. Nanayakkara ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valdone Kolaityte ◽  
Ishani Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Daniel Newport ◽  
Imran Aslam

Abstract Background Given the pressure of COVID pandemic, the UK Intercollegiate guidance encouraged a move towards non-operative or open appendicectomy management of acute appendicitis. The aim of the study was to assess the approaches used to manage acute appendicitis and their outcomes during pandemic peak and after it. Methods This was a single-centre retrospective study, 2-observer data collection. We collected and analysed data on acute appendicitis management approaches (surgical and non-surgical) and patient outcomes were compared during the peak of the pandemic (04-2020 to 06-2020) and post-peak (07-2020 to 09-2020) periods. Results 190 patients - (peak – 88, F:M=1.09, median age – 30.5) and post-peak 102 (F:M=1.12, median age -31)). There were no significant differences for APPY risk score, ASA grade, comorbidities between the groups. There was more diagnostic imaging performed during the peak of the pandemic (peak 71.6%, post-peak – 56.9%) (p = 0.035 X2=4.431). Comparison between managing patients during peak and post-peak showed that approaches were the following: conservative (14.8% vs 14.7%, P = 0.998), laparoscopic appendicectomy (65.3% vs 96.6% P = <0.001), open appendicectomy (34.7% vs 3.4% P = <0.001). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo II-IIIb), readmission to hospital, or total LoS (median=3 days) between the groups (p > 0.05). Median LoS for patients treated conservatively was 1 day. Only 1 patient developed COVID postoperatively, the mortality was 0%. Conclusions Treatment strategies adapted and modified in COVID peak were effective and safe in managing acute appendicitis. Laparoscopic surgery remained a safe practice even in the peak of COVID pandemic.


2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 1110-1111
Author(s):  
Tasadooq Hussain ◽  
Bilal Elahi ◽  
Ayesha Karimi ◽  
Kartikae Grover ◽  
Peter Kneeshaw

Nephrology ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. A93-A93
Author(s):  
Herzig Ka ◽  
Juffs Hg ◽  
Brown Am ◽  
Gill D ◽  
Hawley Cm ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document