Toward a More General Theory of Value. Edward H. Chamberlin

1959 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 310-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome Rothenberg
Econometrica ◽  
1959 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 543
Author(s):  
F. H. Hahn ◽  
Edward Hastings Chamberlin

1994 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 764
Author(s):  
Humberto Barreto ◽  
Henry K. Woo

1958 ◽  
Vol 68 (271) ◽  
pp. 541
Author(s):  
J. E. Meade ◽  
E. H. Chamberlin

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 93-108
Author(s):  
Christoph Halbig

Autonomy and ethics are related to each other in complex ways. The paper starts by distinguishing and characterizing three basic dimensions of this relation. It proceeds by arguing for the compatibility of moral realism with a due respect for human autonomy. Nevertheless, supernaturalist moral realism seems to pose a special challenge for the autonomy of ethics as a self-standing normative realm. The paper ends with some considerations on the role of divine authority both in metaethics and in the general theory of value.


1998 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas K. Rymes

In The General Theory, John Maynard Keynes broke with the quantity theory of money, not just in working out a monetary theory of production but, as he says, in arguing the case for a monetary theory of value. Keynes writes (CW, 7, pp. xxii-xxiii):A monetary economy, we shall find, is essentially one in which changing views about the future are capable of influencing the quantity of employment and not merely its direction. But our method of analyzing the economic behaviour of the present under the influence of changing ideas about the future is one which depends on the interaction of supply and demand, and is in this way linked up with our fundamental theory of value. We are thus led to a more general theory, which includes the classical theory with which we are familiar, as a special case.


1960 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 487
Author(s):  
Emile James ◽  
Edward H. Chamberlin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document