The First Direct Measurement of the Mass of a Blue Straggler in the Core of a Globular Cluster: BSS 19 in 47 Tucanae

1997 ◽  
Vol 489 (1) ◽  
pp. L59-L62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael M. Shara ◽  
Rex A. Saffer ◽  
Mario Livio
2006 ◽  
Vol 641 (1) ◽  
pp. 281-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Knigge ◽  
R. L. Gilliland ◽  
A. Dieball ◽  
D. R. Zurek ◽  
M. M. Shara ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 3 (S246) ◽  
pp. 341-345
Author(s):  
Eva Noyola ◽  
Karl Gebhardt ◽  
Marcel Bergmann

AbstractThe globular cluster ω Centauri is one of the largest and most massive members of the Galactic system. Its classification as a globular cluster has been challenged making it a candidate for being the stripped core of an accreted dwarf galaxy; this and the fact that it has one of the largest velocity dispersions for star clusters in our galaxy makes it an interesting candidate for harboring an intermediate mass black hole. We measure the surface brightness profile from integrated light on an HST/ACS image, and find a central power-law cusp of logarithmic slope -0.08. We also analyze Gemini GMOS-IFU kinematic data for a 5”x5” field centered on the nucleus of the cluster, as well as for a field 14″ away. We detect a clear rise in the velocity dispersion from 18.6 kms−1 at 14″ to 23 kms−1 in the center. Given the very large core in ω Cen (2.58'), an increase in the dispersion in the central 10″ is difficult to attribute to stellar remnants, since it requires too many dark remnants and the implied configuration would dissolve quickly given the relaxation time in the core. However, the increase could be consistent with the existence of a central black hole. Assuming a constant M/L for the stars within the core, the dispersion profile from these data and data at larger radii implies a black hole mass of 4.0+0.75−1.0×104M⊙. We have also run flattened, orbit-based models and find a similar mass. In addition, the no black hole case for the orbit model requires an extreme amount of radial anisotropy, which is difficult to preserve given the short relaxation time of the cluster.


Nature ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 352 (6333) ◽  
pp. 297-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Paresce ◽  
M. Shara ◽  
G. Meylan ◽  
D. Baxter ◽  
P. Greenfield ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 648 (2) ◽  
pp. 1026-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven R. Warren ◽  
Eric L. Sandquist ◽  
Michael Bolte

1995 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig Sosin ◽  
Ivan R. King
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 1060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgi I. Mandushev ◽  
Gregory G. Fahlman ◽  
Harvey B. Richer ◽  
Ian B. Thompson

2012 ◽  
Vol 144 (6) ◽  
pp. 161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Kai ◽  
Qian Sheng-Bang

2019 ◽  
Vol 621 ◽  
pp. L10 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Portegies Zwart

We analyze the position of the two populations of blue stragglers in the globular cluster M30 in the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram. Both populations of blue stragglers are brighter than the cluster’s turn-off, but one population, the blue blue-stragglers, aligns along the zero-age main sequence whereas the other, red population is elevated in brightness (or color) by ∼0.75 mag. Based on stellar evolution and merger simulations we argue that the red population, which composes about 40% of the blue stragglers in M 30, has formed at a constant rate of ∼2.8 blue stragglers per gigayear over the last ∼10 Gyr. The blue population on the other hand formed in a burst that started ∼3.2 Gyr ago at a peak rate of 30 blue stragglers per gigayear with an e-folding time scale of 0.93 Gyr. We speculate that the burst resulted from the core collapse of the cluster at an age of about 9.8 Gyr, whereas the constantly formed population is the result of mass transfer and mergers through binary evolution. In this scenario, about half the binaries in the cluster effectively result in a blue straggler.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document