Iron and Steel in the Industrial Revolution. Thomas S. Ashton

Isis ◽  
1927 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-134
Author(s):  
Cecil H. Desch
1925 ◽  
Vol 35 (139) ◽  
pp. 470
Author(s):  
J. H. Clapham ◽  
T. S. Ashton

1991 ◽  
Vol 24 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 122-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hayes

At a time when the Republican party in America seems to have abandoned its brief hopes of proclaiming a new paradigm, it may seem apropos to observe that old ones die hard—and not only in public life. A case in point from the scholarly world is the subject of this essay: the persistent historiographical notion of industrial factionalism. Throughout this century, students of German political economy have tended to see the country's business world as divided between two groupings. One comprises the classic heavy industries of the first Industrial Revolution and the Ruhr: coal, iron, and steel. Supposedly oriented toward domestic markets, burdened with high labor costs, doomed to flattening gains in productivity and profits, and habituated to hierarchy within their plants and the nation, executives in this grouping have figured in the historical literature as consistently and intransigently united against free trade, labor unions, and parliamentary government—indeed, against modernization itself.


1969 ◽  
Vol 184 (1) ◽  
pp. 1279-1289
Author(s):  
Henry Clay

Historically the making of iron and steel in any quantity was confined to places where fuel—originally wood carbon, but since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, coal—was cheap and local ore available, but even so the industry is such a large user of fuel that the need to conserve it has meant that the total energy concept has been understood in the integrated iron and steel works for at least 50 years. However, it was not until roughly 15 years ago that big improvements in ironmaking and major changes in steelmaking completely altered the fuel and energy balance of a modern works. These changes have been fostered by a rise in the price of coal compared with other fuels and compared with costs generally; also by the development of ‘tonnage’ oxygen plants and by the availability of bulk carriers for oil and ore. The effects on the fuel and energy balances are considered. Although in such a heavily capitalized industry widespread adoption of new processes is inevitably slow, still further changes can be foreseen and some of these may greatly affect the energy requirements of the steel works of the future. Natural gas may compete, not only with oil as a fuel, but also with coke as a reducing agent in making iron. Ore already reduced to iron may be shipped to the United Kingdom at a price that will make the integrated iron and steel works a thing of the past.


1925 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 618
Author(s):  
M. B. ◽  
T. S. Ashton

1982 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 65-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Aylen

Steel is the basic material of industrialisation; and also of war. For Britain in the eighteenth century, iron and steel was the cornerstone of the industrial revolution; for Germany, a century later, the steel industry was the foundation of the militarism of Bismarck. Both countries supplied steel rails for America's westward expansion in the third quarter of the nineteenth century, before the emergence of America's own steel industry. Until the 1880s the British iron and steel industry was dominant. By the turn of the century both America and Germany had overtaken Britain as a steel producer. Today Britain has the smallest of the three industries. In 1979, a relatively good year, 21.5 million tonnes of crude steel were made in Britain, compared with 46 million in Germany and 123.3 in America.


1966 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Hartwell

From about 750 to 1100, China experienced a series of economic changes roughly comparable to the subsequent patterns of European growth from the Crusades to the eve of the French Revolution. The spread in the use of money, development of new credit and fiscal institutions, increase in interregional and international trade, and colonization of hitherto marginal land which took place in the Occident during the half millennium preceding the Reformation was paralleled by an earlier era of progress in East Asia during the two-hundred-fifty years from the rebellion of An Lu-shan (755) to the treaty of Shan-yüan 1004). And the achievements of late sixteenthand early seventeenth-century England, which John Nef terms an “early industrial revolution,” were in many respects even exceeded by the impressive expansion of mining and manufacturing in eleventh-century China.


1927 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 300
Author(s):  
H. T. Warshow ◽  
T. S. Ashton ◽  
H. Hamilton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document