scholarly journals Innovation-Theory and Practice

1975 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 316-322
Author(s):  
Henry R. Weinstock ◽  
Marjorie V. Phelps ◽  
Dick D. Miller
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaella Manzini ◽  
Valentina Lazzarotti ◽  
Luisa Pellegrini

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (06) ◽  
pp. 1540013 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALLEN T. ALEXANDER ◽  
KRISTEL MILLER ◽  
SEAN FIELDING

The emergence of open innovation theory and practice, alongside the evolution to a quadruple helix system of innovation, has led to a need for universities to rethink their models of engagement with industry and wider society. One important element in this system is the entrepreneurial academics; however, there is a lack of research considering the motivations of entrepreneurial academics, who differ from academic entrepreneurs, to engage in knowledge transfer in line with open innovation policy. This research offers practical insights on whether new models of engagement, increasingly offered by universities, really address the policy drivers for open innovation. Furthermore, this research explores whether these activities might motivate entrepreneurial academics to participate. Preliminary findings identify that many supposedly new collaboration activities do not really motivate entrepreneurial academics. This may have important implications on the ability of universities to become truly open and to encourage their academics to become engaged in collaboration and impact.


2017 ◽  
pp. 21-28
Author(s):  
Nick Coad ◽  
Paul Pritchard

2021 ◽  
pp. 234094442110133
Author(s):  
Shanthi Gopalakrishnan ◽  
Sarah Kovoor-Misra

In this article, we explore the Covid-19 crisis through the lens of innovation. We focus on the threat and opportunity drivers of innovation, and some of their product/service and process outcomes. We contribute to crisis innovation theory and practice by suggesting that there are two categories of innovation during multi-level crises, such as a pandemic: (1) reactive, threat-driven innovations that are created to contain and respond to organizational problems and disruptions that arise from the crisis; and (2) proactive, opportunity-driven innovations that are created to capitalize on environmental needs and opportunities. We highlight the role of human, physical interdependence in organizations’ core technologies that create threats for some organizations and opportunities for others during the pandemic. JEL CLASSIFICATION: O32; O34; H12


2021 ◽  
pp. 69-72
Author(s):  
D.K. Balakhanova

The training of specialists in the field of management and organizational and managerial innovations is especially relevant in modern conditions, since it is they who contribute to the adoption of competent, competent and modern decisions in the field of management,


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document