Microbiological Evaluation of Central Venous Catheter Administration Hubs

2000 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Christophe Lucet ◽  
Jan Hayon ◽  
Fabrice Bruneel ◽  
Jean-Louis Dumoulin ◽  
Marie-Laure Joly-Guillou
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Catheter Colonization ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Short Term

AbstractWe compared, in three intensive care units, colonization of hubs with hub protection boxes or hubs with needleless closed connectors; 137 central venous catheters and 451 hubs were randomized in two groups with similar characteristics. Catheter and hub colonization were not different between the two groups. Among 30 colonized catheters, the same isolate was found in only two hubs; hub contamination rarely is responsible for catheter colonization in short-term catheters. Further studies are required to evaluate the benefit of protected hubs compared with unprotected hubs.

Risk factor identification and predictive models for central line requirements for patients on vasopressors

2021 ◽  
pp. 0310057X2110242
Author(s):  
Adrian D Haimovich ◽  
Ruoyi Jiang ◽  
Richard A Taylor ◽  
Justin B Belsky
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Central Venous

Vasopressors are ubiquitous in intensive care units. While central venous catheters are the preferred route of infusion, recent evidence suggests peripheral administration may be safe for short, single-agent courses. Here, we identify risk factors and develop a predictive model for patient central venous catheter requirement using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care, a single-centre dataset of patients admitted to an intensive care unit between 2008 and 2019. Using prior literature, a composite endpoint of prolonged single-agent courses (>24 hours) or multi-agent courses of any duration was used to identify likely central venous catheter requirement. From a cohort of 69,619 intensive care unit stays, there were 17,053 vasopressor courses involving one or more vasopressors that met study inclusion criteria. In total, 3807 (22.3%) vasopressor courses involved a single vasopressor for less than six hours, 7952 (46.6%) courses for less than 24 hours and 5757 (33.8%) involved multiple vasopressors of any duration. Of these, 3047 (80.0%) less than six-hour and 6423 (80.8%) less than 24-hour single vasopressor courses used a central venous catheter. Logistic regression models identified associations between the composite endpoint and intubation (odds ratio (OR) 2.36, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 2.16 to 2.58), cardiac diagnosis (OR 0.72, CI 0.65 to 0.80), renal impairment (OR 1.61, CI 1.50 to 1.74), older age (OR 1.002, Cl 1.000 to 1.005) and vital signs in the hour before initiation (heart rate, OR 1.006, CI 1.003 to 1.009; oxygen saturation, OR 0.996, CI 0.993 to 0.999). A logistic regression model predicting the composite endpoint had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (standard deviation) of 0.747 (0.013) and an accuracy of 0.691 (0.012). This retrospective study reveals a high prevalence of short vasopressor courses in intensive care unit settings, a majority of which were administered using central venous catheters. We identify several important risk factors that may help guide clinicians deciding between peripheral and central venous catheter administration, and present a predictive model that may inform future prospective trials.

Variation in Arterial and Central Venous Catheter Use in Pediatric Intensive Care Units

2020 ◽  
pp. 088506662096245
Author(s):  
Malini Mahendra ◽  
Patrick McQuillen ◽  
R. Adams Dudley ◽  
Martina A. Steurer
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Units ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
Hospital Characteristics

Objective: Describe patient and hospital characteristics associated with Arterial Catheter (AC) or Central Venous Catheter (CVC) use among pediatric intensive care units (ICUs). Design: Hierarchical mixed effects analyses were used to identify patient and hospital characteristics associated with AC or CVC placement. The ICU adjusted median odds ratios (ICU-AMOR) for the admission ICU, marginal R2, and conditional intraclass correlation coefficient were reported. Setting: 166 PICUs in the Virtual PICU Systems (VPS, LLC) Database. Patients: 682,791 patients with unscheduled admissions to the PICU. Intervention: None. Measures and Main Results: ACs were placed in (median, [interquartile range]) 8.2% [4.9%-11.3%] of admissions, and CVCs were placed in 14.9% [10.4%-19.3%] of admissions across cohort ICUs. Measured patient characteristics explained about 25% of the variability in AC and CVC placement. Higher Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM2) illness severity scores were associated with increased odds of placement (Odds Ratio (95th% Confidence Interval)) AC: 1.88 (1.87-1.89) and CVC: 1.82 (1.81-1.83) per 1 unit increase in PIM2 score. Primary diagnoses of cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hematology/oncology, infectious, renal/genitourinary, rheumatology, and transplant were associated with increased odds of AC or CVC placement compared to a primary respiratory diagnosis. Presence of in-house attendings 24/7 was associated with increased odds of AC placement 1.32 (1.11-1.57). Admission ICU explained 4.9% and 3.5% of the variability in AC or CVC placement, respectively. The ICU-AMOR showed a patient would have a median increase in odds of 55% and 43% for AC or CVC placement, respectively, if the same patient moved from an ICU with lower odds of placement to an ICU with higher odds of placement. Conclusions: Variation in AC or CVC use exists among PICUs. The admission ICU was more strongly associated with AC than with CVC placement. Further study is needed to understand unexplained variation in AC and CVC use.

scholarly journals Comparison between peripherally inserted central venous catheters and short-term central venous catheter in patients discharged from the ICU

Critical Care ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P388 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Batacchi ◽  
G Zagli ◽  
S diValvasone ◽  
M Ciapetti ◽  
G Cianchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Short Term
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document