Unemployment Insurance and Agricultural Labor in Great Britain. Wilbur J. CoheMethods of Clearance between Unemployment Compensation and Relief Agencies. Arthur T. Jacob

1940 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 605-606
1937 ◽  
Vol 5 (01) ◽  
pp. 4-14
Author(s):  
F. J. C. Honey

It is impossible in these notes to attempt any comprehensive review of the system of compulsory Unemployment Insurance which has operated in this country since 1912. Moreover, the paper by Messrs Kyd & Maddex read before the Institute in January 1929 gives full information up to that date. But I want to start by outlining the original scheme, as I think the way in which it has been modified and extended may be found of interest.The system began with the National Insurance Act, 1911, Part II. Contributions commenced in July 1912 and benefit in January 1913. Only a few industries which were considered to carry a specially heavy risk of unemployment were included, and the numbers insured at the outset were about 2¼ millions. Contributions were 2¼d. per week each from employer and worker, and 1⅔d. from the Exchequer. Benefit was 7s. per week, with a limitation of one week's benefit for every five contributions paid, and a maximum of fifteen weeks' benefit in a year.


Economica ◽  
1950 ◽  
Vol 17 (67) ◽  
pp. 343
Author(s):  
Alan T. Peacock ◽  
Frank Tillyard

1975 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 217-222
Author(s):  
Robert D. Emerson

A number of economic policies are believed to influence an individual's decision of how many hours or weeks to work. Among these policies are welfare programs, income maintenance plans, and unemployment insurance. To date, questions of agricultural labor response to economic incentives have been analyzed by resorting to aggregate data and models, typically utilizing state or U.S. time series data. While this does provide needed information for analysis of some policies, aggregate data and models are deficient in isolating substitution and income effects. These are necessary for analysis of particular programs affecting only income or affecting the individual's budget constraint in a discontinuous way. In particular, aggregate models cannot approach the question of a backward bending supply curve, since aggregate data include not only variations in duration of employment but also variations in labor force participation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Rodems ◽  
H. Luke Shaefer

Social scientists and historians have identified the exclusion of agricultural workers and domestic servants from social insurance programs during the New Deal as a cause of the racially divided US welfare state. The most prominent explanation for these exclusions is that they originated in a Southern-dominated congress and were deliberately designed to exclude a majority of African-American workers from the emerging welfare state. This article examines recent historical scholarship, archival evidence, and information on unemployment compensation programs internationally to situate this policy choice in a wider context. The exclusion of these categories of workers is consistent with the experience of other unemployment insurance programs. Given the close linkages between the technical experts who drafted the US legislation and their counterparts abroad, the exclusion of agricultural workers and domestic servants from unemployment insurance is best understood as an example of policy diffusion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document