CYRIACUS OF ANCONA'S EGYPTIAN VISIT AND ITS REFLECTIONS IN GENTILE BELLINI AND HIERONYMUS BOSCH. Phyllis Williams Lehman

1978 ◽  
Vol 6 (4/5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Stapleton
2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 64-65
Author(s):  
Eberhard J. Wormer
Keyword(s):  

2000 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn F. Jacobs
Keyword(s):  

1937 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 604
Author(s):  
F. E. Hyslop ◽  
Charles de Tolnay
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
JOSEPH LEO KOERNER

This chapter discusses the rise of a painting in everyday life in Northern Europe. It focuses on the representations of ‘everyman’ in the art of the early pioneers of genre painting: Pieter Bruegel the Elder and Hieronymus Bosch. It considers the figure of ‘trapping’ in these artists, as a model both of everyman's relation to the world and of the picture's relation to the viewer.


Author(s):  
Herwig Todts

Prior to the outbreak of World War I, James Ensor (b. 1860 Ostend, Belgium–d. 1949 Ostend, Belgium) worked during the summer months in a souvenir shop owned by his family in the Belgian seaside resort of Ostend. His artistic career took place in the political, financial and cultural capital of Brussels, which was a train ride away from his home. From 1877 to 1880 he attended the Academy of Fine Arts in Brussels, where he participated in Les XX group, La LibreEsthétique artistic society, and the Galérie Georges Giroux. He took part in the cultural life and nightlife of Brussels, where he met literary friends, art lovers, and his mistress Augusta Boogaerts. Ensor believed that the capital sin of producing aesthetic banality could be successfully combated by constantly exploring new subject matter, genres, techniques, materials, styles, and artistic disciplines (he wrote articles and composed music as well). Ensor explored the possibilities of any specific artistic project usually by radicalizing an existing model. His desire to experiment with Realism, Symbolism, Impressionism, Rembrandt’s light, the grotesque repertoire of Hiëronymus Bosch and Francisco Goya, or the farces of Pieter Brueghel resulted in iconographic and stylistic incoherent drawings and paintings with a surreal character. Occasionally Ensor used line, form, brush strokes, and color in an almost autonomous manner. He often employed one of his favored images, the mask, as an ambiguous and psychologically affecting motif (usually as an instrument of unmasking). Since the 1960s, scholars have investigated the subversive function of Ensor’s combination of social and political satire, religious subject matter and a highly private iconography.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document