Three-Generation Models from Global Gauge Anomaly-Free Theories

1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.E.F. Djemaï
Keyword(s):  
1988 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1880-1887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huazhong Zhang ◽  
Susumu Okubo

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (05) ◽  
pp. 1033-1052
Author(s):  
HUAZHONG ZHANG

We study more extensively and completely for global gauge anomalies with some semisimple gauge groups as initiated in Ref. 1. A detailed and complete proof or derivation is provided for the Z2 global (nonperturbative) gauge anomaly given in Ref. 1 for a gauge theory with the semisimple gauge group SU (2) × SU (2) × SU (2) in D = 4 dimensions and Weyl fermions in the irreducible representation (IR) ω = (2, 2, 2) with 2 denoting the corresponding dimensions. This Z2 anomaly was used in the discussions related to all the generic SO (10) and supersymmetric SO (10) unification theories1 for the total generation numbers of fermions and mirror fermions. Our result1 shows that the global anomaly coefficient formula is given by A(ω) = exp [iπQ2(□)] = -1 in this case with Q2(□) being the Dynkin index for SU (8) in the fundamental IR (□) = (8) and that the corresponding gauge transformations need to be topologically nontrivial simultaneously in all the three SU (2) factors for the homotopy group Π4( SU (2) × SU (2) × SU (2))is also discussed, and as shown by the results1 the semisimple gauge transformations collectively may have physical consequences which do not correspond to successive simple gauge transformations. The similar result given in Ref. 1 for the Z2 global gauge anomaly of gauge group SU (2) × SU (2) with Weyl fermions in the IR ω = (2, 2) with 2 denoting the corresponding dimensions is also discussed with proof similar to the case of SU (2) × SU (2) × SU (2). We also give a complete proof for some relevant topological results. We expect that our results and discussions may also be useful in more general studies related to global aspects of gauge theories. Gauge anomalies for the relevant semisimple gauge groups are also briefly discussed in higher dimensions, especially for self-contragredient representations, with discussions involving trace identities relating to Ref. 15. We also relate the discussions to our results and propositions in our previous studies of global gauge anomalies. We also remark the connection of our results and discussions to the total generation numbers in relevant theories.


2006 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 467-471
Author(s):  
H. So ◽  
H. Suzuki
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 535 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 233-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.R. Klinkhamer
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 596 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 315-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.James Gates ◽  
Marcus T. Grisaru ◽  
Marcia E. Knutt ◽  
Silvia Penati ◽  
Hiroshi Suzuki

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferruccio Feruglio

Abstract The conditions for the absence of gauge anomalies in effective field theories (EFT) are rivisited. General results from the cohomology of the BRST operator do not prevent potential anomalies arising from the non-renormalizable sector, when the gauge group is not semi-simple, like in the Standard Model EFT (SMEFT). By considering a simple explicit model that mimics the SMEFT properties, we compute the anomaly in the regularized theory, including a complete set of dimension six operators. We show that the dependence of the anomaly on the non-renormalizable part can be removed by adding a local counterterm to the theory. As a result the condition for gauge anomaly cancellation is completely controlled by the charge assignment of the fermion sector, as in the renormalizable theory.


Author(s):  
Yasunori Lee ◽  
Yuji Tachikawa

Abstract Global gauge anomalies in 6d associated with non-trivial homotopy groups π6(G) for G = SU(2), SU(3), and G2 were computed and utilized in the past. In the modern bordism point of view of anomalies, however, they come from the bordism groups Ω7spin (BG), which are in fact trivial and therefore preclude their existence. Instead, it was noticed that a proper treatment of the 6d Green-Schwarz mechanism reproduces the same anomaly cancellation conditions derived from π6(G). In this paper, we revisit and clarify the relation between these two different approaches.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document