Canonical approach to quantum gravity

1987 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 851-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Christodoulakis ◽  
J Zanelli
1992 ◽  
Vol 01 (03n04) ◽  
pp. 439-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
HIDEO KODAMA

The basic features of the complex canonical formulation of general relativity and the recent developments in the quantum gravity program based on it are reviewed. The exposition is intended to be complementary to the review articles already available and some original arguments are included. In particular the conventional treatment of the Hamiltonian constraint and quantum states in the canonical approach to quantum gravity is criticized and a new formulation is proposed.


1996 ◽  
Vol 05 (06) ◽  
pp. 629-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
ABHAY ASHTEKAR

Over the last two years, the canonical approach to quantum gravity based on connections and triads has been put on a firm mathematical footing through the development and application of a new functional calculus on the space of gauge equivalent connections. This calculus does not use any background fields (such as a metric) and thus well-suited to a fully non-perturbative treatment of quantum gravity. Using this framework, quantum geometry is examined. Fundamental excitations turn out to be one-dimensional, rather like polymers. Geometrical observables such as areas of surfaces and volumes of regions are purely discrete spectra. Continuum picture arises only upon coarse graining of suitable semi-classical states. Next, regulated quantum diffeomorphism constraints can be imposed in an anomaly-free fashion and the space of solutions can be given a natural Hilbert space structure. Progress has also been made on the quantum Hamiltonian constraint in a number of directions. In particular, there is a recent approach based on a generalized .Wick transformation which maps solutions to the Euclidean quantum constraints to those of the Lorentzian theory. These developments are summarized. Emphasis is on conveying the underlying ideas and overall pictures rather than technical details.


2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (08) ◽  
pp. 1113-1129
Author(s):  
THOMAS THIEMANN

We describe the canonical approach to quantum gravity and report on the status of its most advanced implementation, Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG).


1983 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 414-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
David G. Boulware

1998 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
pp. 535-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
ECKEHARD W. MIELKE ◽  
DIRK KREIMER

The Dirac equation in Riemann–Cartan spacetimes with torsion is reconsidered. As is well-known, only the axial covector torsion A, a one-form, couples to massive Dirac fields. Using diagrammatic techniques, we show that besides the familiar Riemannian term only the Pontrjagin type four-form dA ∧ dA does arise additionally in the chiral anomaly, but not the Nieh–Yan term d* A, as has been claimed recently. Implications for cosmic strings in Einstein–Cartan theory as well as for Ashtekar's canonical approach to quantum gravity are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Thiemann

The canonical approach to quantum gravity has been put on a firm mathematical foundation in the recent decades. Even the quantum dynamics can be rigorously defined, however, due to the tremendously non-polynomial character of the gravitational interaction, the corresponding Wheeler–DeWitt operator-valued distribution suffers from quantisation ambiguities that need to be fixed. In a very recent series of works, we have employed methods from the constructive quantum field theory in order to address those ambiguities. Constructive QFT trades quantum fields for random variables and measures, thereby phrasing the theory in the language of quantum statistical physics. The connection to the canonical formulation is made via Osterwalder–Schrader reconstruction. It is well known in quantum statistics that the corresponding ambiguities in measures can be fixed using renormalisation. The associated renormalisation flow can thus be used to define a canonical renormalisation programme. The purpose of this article was to review and further develop these ideas and to put them into context with closely related earlier and parallel programmes.


1982 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 3342-3353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhay Ashtekar ◽  
Gary T. Horowitz

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (20) ◽  
pp. 1250106 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARTIN KOBER

In this paper, a generalized quantization principle for the gravitational field in canonical quantum gravity, especially with respect to quantum geometrodynamics is considered. This assumption can be interpreted as a transfer from the generalized uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics, which is postulated as generalization of the Heisenberg algebra to introduce a minimal length, to a corresponding quantization principle concerning the quantities of quantum gravity. According to this presupposition there have to be given generalized representations of the operators referring to the observables in the canonical approach of a quantum description of general relativity. This also leads to generalized constraints for the states and thus to a generalized Wheeler–DeWitt equation determining a new dynamical behavior. As a special manifestation of this modified canonical theory of quantum gravity, quantum cosmology is explored. The generalized cosmological Wheeler–DeWitt equation corresponding to the application of the generalized quantization principle to the cosmological degree of freedom is solved by using Sommerfelds polynomial method.


2020 ◽  
pp. 160-192
Author(s):  
Dean Rickles

This chapter charts the early development of the canonical quantum gravity (that is, the quantization of the gravitational field in Hamiltonian form). What we find in this period include: the establishment of a procedure for quantizing in curved spaces; the first expressions for the Hamiltonian of general relativity; recognition of the existence and importance of constraints (i.e. the generators of infinitesimal coordinate transformations); a focus on the problem of observables (and the realisation of conceptual implications in defining these for generally relativistic theories), and a (template of a) method for quantizing the theory. Although it commenced relatively early, the canonical approach was slow in its subsequent development. This had two sources: (1) it required the introduction of tools and concepts from outside of quantum gravity proper (namely, the constraint machinery and the parameter formalism); (2) by its very nature, it is highly rigorous in a conceptual sense, demanding lots of groundwork to be established, in terms of the structure of physical observables, before the actual issue of quantization can even be considered. Work was further complicated by the fact that these two sources of difficulty happened to be entangled. Particular emphasis is placed on the parameter formalism of Paul Weiss.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document