HPA Convenes Conference on Public Health Response to Polonium-210 Radionuclide decay data and activity comparisons Food Standards Agency Survey-Analysis of the Natural Radioactivity Content of Bottled Waters Cancer incidence among people exposed to60Co-contaminated construction steel in Taiwan First call for FP7 HPA update on public health issues related to Polonium-210 investigation

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-105 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (S1) ◽  
pp. 128-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca E. Ford-Paz ◽  
Catherine DeCarlo Santiago ◽  
Claire A. Coyne ◽  
Claudio Rivera ◽  
Sisi Guo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Joshua M. Sharfstein

Issues of responsibility and blame are very rarely discussed in public health training, but are seldom forgotten in practice. Blame often follows a crisis, and leaders of health agencies should be able to think strategically about how to handle such accusations before being faced with the pain of dealing with them. When the health agency is not at all at fault, officials can make the case for a strong public health response without reservation. When the agency is entirely to blame, a quick and sincere apology can allow the agency to retain credibility. The most difficult situation is when the agency is partly to blame. The goal in this situation is to accept the appropriate amount of blame while working quickly to resolve the crisis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document