Rapid detection of heavy elements in blood extracted from wounds using x-ray fluorescence analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 1384-1392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukie Izumoto ◽  
Tsugufumi Matsuyama ◽  
Manabu Mizuhira ◽  
Hitoshi Imaseki ◽  
Tsuyoshi Hamano ◽  
...  
Nature ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 211 (5053) ◽  
pp. 1085-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. GROOT ◽  
P. C. M. N. BRUIJS ◽  
J. H. T. C. VERBEEK

2004 ◽  
Vol 59 (8) ◽  
pp. 1323-1328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironari Yamada ◽  
Hideo Saisho ◽  
Toru Hirai ◽  
Junichi Hirano

1972 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 581-583
Author(s):  
B. M. Aleksandrov ◽  
S. M. Solov'ev ◽  
L. I. Tyvin ◽  
V. P. �ismont

1986 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 175-182
Author(s):  
Peter B. DeGroot

AbstractOne method of dealing with unanalyzed light elements in x-ray fluorescence analyses is to add a relatively large quantity of a diluent to the sample. The interelement effects on the measured radiation are then essentially all due to the diluent, and the effects of the unanalyzed elements are ignored. The general practice has been to use a diluent compound composed of light elements. The rationale for this is that light elements absorb the analyte radiation less strongly than heavy ones, leaving higher net intensity available after dilution. However, since absorption effects are greater with heavy elements, a smaller dilution factor can be used to reach the analyte concentration at which the effects of unanalyzed elements on the analyte radiation are negligible compared to diluent effects. In many cases, the smaller dilution factor almost exactly compensates for the increased absorption. There is essentially no intensity penalty for using a heavy element diluent. In fact, there are some advantages to doing so. The lower dilution factor with heavy elements can avoid problems with multiple dilutions or accurate weighing and homogeneous blending of very small quantities necessary to achieve high dilution factors. Significantly less continuum radiation is scattered from heavy element matrices, and signal-to-background ratio can be higher in some parts of the spectrum. With high energy analyte lines, heavy element dilution results in infinitely thick samples, simplifying sample preparation. Theoretical intensity calculations using the XRFll matrix correction program are used to predict the appropriate dilution factor for a range of analyte x-ray emission wavelengths with a variety of diluents. The results are verified experimentally.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sei Masaoka ◽  
Masaki Morita ◽  
Hironari Yamada ◽  
Daisuke Hasegawa ◽  
Hideo Saisho

Author(s):  
D. A. Carpenter ◽  
M. A. Taylor

The development of intense sources of x rays has led to renewed interest in the use of microbeams of x rays in x-ray fluorescence analysis. Sparks pointed out that the use of x rays as a probe offered the advantages of high sensitivity, low detection limits, low beam damage, and large penetration depths with minimal specimen preparation or perturbation. In addition, the option of air operation provided special advantages for examination of hydrated systems or for nondestructive microanalysis of large specimens.The disadvantages of synchrotron sources prompted the development of laboratory-based instrumentation with various schemes to maximize the beam flux while maintaining small point-to-point resolution. Nichols and Ryon developed a microprobe using a rotating anode source and a modified microdiffractometer. Cross and Wherry showed that by close-coupling the x-ray source, specimen, and detector, good intensities could be obtained for beam sizes between 30 and 100μm. More importantly, both groups combined specimen scanning with modern imaging techniques for rapid element mapping.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document