scholarly journals The use of dose quantities in radiological protection: ICRP Publication 147 Ann ICRP 50(1) 2021

Author(s):  
John D Harrison ◽  
Mikhail I Balonov ◽  
Francois O Bochud ◽  
Colin John Martin ◽  
Hans G Menzel ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 11-135
Author(s):  
M. Kai ◽  
T. Homma ◽  
J. Lochard ◽  
T. Schneider ◽  
J.F. Lecomte ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 191 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-120
Author(s):  
Scott O Schwahn ◽  
Caleigh E Samuels ◽  
Richard W Leggett

Abstract Inhalation and ingestion dose coefficients for the embryo and fetus from intakes of radionuclides by the mother are provided in the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 88 for intake of each of 74 radionuclides. To address the many other possible radionuclides to which workers may be exposed, effective dose coefficients were developed for the embryo/fetus for all additional radionuclides addressed in ICRP Publication 107 with half-life of 10 min or more. The general approach was to use the estimated dose to the mother’s uterus during pregnancy as a scalable proxy for the dose to the embryo/fetus. The set of scaling factors used in the study was derived from analyses of the relationships of the dose to the mother’s uterus and the effective dose to the embryo/fetus for the ~400 cases (considering two intake modes and multiple forms of many of the radionuclides) addressed in Publication 88.


2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 197-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Ortiz López

Radiotherapy has unquestionable benefits, but it is also associated with unique and specific safety issues. It is the only application of radiation in which humans are intentionally delivered very high doses. Safety in radiotherapy remains heavily dependent on human actions. A step-by-step approach is suggested for the prevention of accidental exposures in radiation therapy: (1) allocation of responsibilities to qualified professionals, and design of a quality and safety programme - no radiotherapy practice should be operated without these key elements; (2) use of the lessons from accidental exposures to test whether the quality and safety programme is sufficiently robust against these types of events –publications by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and the International Atomic Energy Agency provide a collection of lessons to facilitate this step; and (3) find other latent risks by posing the questions ‘What else could go wrong?’ or ‘What other potential hazards might be present?’ in a systematic, anticipative manner - methods to do so are described briefly in ICRP Publication 112.


2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
P-L. Khong ◽  
H. Ringertz ◽  
V. Donoghue ◽  
D. Frush ◽  
M. Rehani ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Ortiz López ◽  
L.T. Dauer ◽  
R. Loose ◽  
C.J. Martin ◽  
D.L. Miller ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 110-118
Author(s):  
J. Lochard

Publication 111, published by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) in 2009, provided the first recommendations for dealing with the long-term recovery phase after a nuclear accident. Its focus is on the protection of people living in long-term contaminated areas after a nuclear accident, drawing on the experience of the Belarus population, Cumbrian sheep farmers in the UK, and Sami reindeer herders in Norway affected by the fallout from Chernobyl. The ICRP dialogue initiative in Fukushima confirmed what had been identified after Chernobyl, namely the very strong concern for health, particularly that of children, loss of control over everyday life, apprehension about the future, disintegration of family life and of the social and economic fabric, and the threat to the autonomy and dignity of affected people. Through their testimonies and reflections, the participants of the 12 dialogue meetings shed light on this complex situation. The ICRP dialogue initiative also confirmed that the wellbeing of the affected people is at stake, and radiological protection must focus on rehabilitation of their living conditions. The challenge is to incorporate the important clarifications resulting from the ICRP dialogue initiative into the updated version of Publication 111 that is currently in development. This paper does not necessarily reflect the views of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.


2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 294-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Weiss

The report of International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Task Group 80 entitled ‘Radiological protection in geological disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste’ updates and consolidates previous ICRP recommendations related to solid waste disposal (ICRP Publications 46, 77, and 81). The recommendations given in this report apply specifically to geological disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste. The report explains how the 2007 system of radiological protection, described in ICRP Publication 103, can be applied in the context of the geological disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste. The report is written as a self-standing document. It describes the different stages in the lifetime of a geological disposal facility, and addresses the application of relevant radiological protection principles for each stage depending on the various exposure situations that can be encountered. In particular, the crucial factor that influences application of the protection system over the different phases in the lifetime of a disposal facility is the level of oversight that is present. The level of oversight affects the capability to reduce or avoid exposures. Three main time frames have to be considered for the purpose of radiological protection: time of direct oversight when the disposal facility is being implemented and active oversight is taking place; time of indirect oversight when the disposal facility is sealed and indirect oversight is being exercised to provide additional assurance on behalf of the population; and time of no oversight when oversight is no longer exercised because memory is lost.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document