scholarly journals Quantum Double of Yangian of strange Lie superalgebraQnand multiplicative formula for universalR-matrix

2018 ◽  
Vol 965 ◽  
pp. 012040
Author(s):  
Vladimir Stukopin
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuting Hu ◽  
Yidun Wan

Abstract We derive a partial electric-magnetic (PEM) duality transformation of the twisted quantum double (TQD) model TQD(G, α) — discrete Dijkgraaf-Witten model — with a finite gauge group G, which has an Abelian normal subgroup N , and a three-cocycle α ∈ H3(G, U(1)). Any equivalence between two TQD models, say, TQD(G, α) and TQD(G′, α′), can be realized as a PEM duality transformation, which exchanges the N-charges and N-fluxes only. Via the PEM duality, we construct an explicit isomorphism between the corresponding TQD algebras Dα(G) and Dα′(G′) and derive the map between the anyons of one model and those of the other.


1999 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. MAJID

We introduce a quasitriangular Hopf algebra or ‘quantum group’ U(B), the double-bosonization, associated to every braided group B in the category of H-modules over a quasitriangular Hopf algebra H, such that B appears as the ‘positive root space’, H as the ‘Cartan subalgebra’ and the dual braided group B* as the ‘negative root space’ of U(B). The choice B=Uq(n+) recovers Lusztig's construction of Uq(g); other choices give more novel quantum groups. As an application, our construction provides a canonical way of building up quantum groups from smaller ones by repeatedly extending their positive and negative root spaces by linear braided groups; we explicitly construct Uq(sl3) from Uq(sl2) by this method, extending it by the quantum-braided plane. We provide a fundamental representation of U(B) in B. A projection from the quantum double, a theory of double biproducts and a Tannaka–Krein reconstruction point of view are also provided.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrey T. Bagmanov ◽  
Andrey L. Sanin
Keyword(s):  

1967 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 749-750
Author(s):  
S. L. Segal

Recently Gioia and Subbarao [2] studied essentially the following problem: If g(n) is an arithmetic function, and , then what is the behaviour of H(a, n) defined for each fixed integer a ≥ 2 by1By using Vaidyanathaswamy′s formula [e.g., 1], they obtain an explicit formula for H(a, n) in case g(n) is positive and completely multiplicative (Formula 2.2 of [2]). However, Vaidyanathaswamy′s formula is unnecessary to the proof of this result, which indeed follows more simply without its use, by exploiting a simple idea used earlier by Subbarao [3] (referred to also in the course of [2]).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document