scholarly journals Schur function averages for the real Ginibre ensemble

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (22) ◽  
pp. 222002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Jürgen Sommers ◽  
Boris A Khoruzhenko
2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 1395-1413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mihail Poplavskyi ◽  
Roger Tribe ◽  
Oleg Zaboronski

2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (40) ◽  
pp. 405003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Jürgen Sommers ◽  
Waldemar Wieczorek
Keyword(s):  
The Real ◽  

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1621-1651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Rider ◽  
Christopher D. Sinclair
Keyword(s):  
The Real ◽  

2016 ◽  
Vol 163 (2) ◽  
pp. 303-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Carlos García del Molino ◽  
Khashayar Pakdaman ◽  
Jonathan Touboul ◽  
Gilles Wainrib
Keyword(s):  
The Real ◽  

Author(s):  
Toshihiko Takita ◽  
Tomonori Naguro ◽  
Toshio Kameie ◽  
Akihiro Iino ◽  
Kichizo Yamamoto

Recently with the increase in advanced age population, the osteoporosis becomes the object of public attention in the field of orthopedics. The surface topography of the bone by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is one of the most useful means to study the bone metabolism, that is considered to make clear the mechanism of the osteoporosis. Until today many specimen preparation methods for SEM have been reported. They are roughly classified into two; the anorganic preparation and the simple preparation. The former is suitable for observing mineralization, but has the demerit that the real surface of the bone can not be observed and, moreover, the samples prepared by this method are extremely fragile especially in the case of osteoporosis. On the other hand, the latter has the merit that the real information of the bone surface can be obtained, though it is difficult to recognize the functional situation of the bone.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document