Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: All the manuscripts received form the authors were sent to the reviewers. Each manuscript was reviewed by one reviewer and re-checked by editor. All comments were sent back to the authors to let them make all corrections. The revised versions of manuscripts were checked and approved by editors. • Number of submissions received: 15 • Number of submissions sent for review: 15 • Number of submissions accepted:11 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100):73.3 • Average number of reviews per paper: 1 • Total number of reviewers involved:10 • Any additional info on review process: Reviewers considered manuscripts in accordance with: 1) Technical Criteria: scientific rigour, accuracy, correctness of selected methodology. 2) Quality Criteria: originality and novelty, clarity of motivation and results importance. 3) Presentation Criteria: clarity of expression, readability and completeness of presentation, quality of all presented data and figures. • Contact person for queries: Name: Sergey Dubinskiy Email: [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering ◽

10.1088/1757-899x/1192/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1192 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Review Process ◽

Materials Science ◽

Peer Review Process ◽

Science And Engineering ◽

Double Blind ◽

Materials Science And Engineering ◽

Funding Information ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other Double Blind- Remove the author names and affiliations of the authors anywhere in the manuscript. Remove names and affiliations under the title within the manuscript. Do not include or remove any author names or affiliations in the Acknowledgements section of your manuscript. Author names and Funding information should be removed and can be included later in the peer review process. Do not sign your author response, rebuttals, or appeals with author names. Do not include or remove any names in any file names and ensure document properties are also anonymised. Check that your figures and schemes do not include author details. • Conference submission management system: ∘ https://easychair.org/conferences/submissions?a=26389499 • Number of submissions received: 114 (Abstract) • Number of submissions sent for review: 68 • Number of submissions accepted: 59 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 55.6% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 83 • Any additional info on review process: Turnitin was used to check plagiarism. • Contact person for queries: Assoc. Prof. Ir. Dr. Sarina Sulaiman, Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia. Email: [email protected] Assoc. Prof. Dr Noor Noor Illi, Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia. Email: [email protected] Dr Mohd Firdaus Abd Wahab, Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia. Email: [email protected] Prof. Dr. Zahangir Alam, Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia. Email: [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering ◽

10.1088/1757-899x/1195/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1195 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Management System ◽

Review Process ◽

Materials Science ◽

Science And Engineering ◽

Materials Science And Engineering ◽

Check System ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind (authors’ identities are known to the reviewers, reviewers’ identities are hidden from authors) • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? Reviewers were requested to review the manuscripts by pointing out the strengths, weaknesses, errors, omissions, and inconsistencies in the papers. Authors were encouraged to revise the papers based on the reviewer’s comments. The review process was then repeated until the reviewers were satisfied with the quality of the submissions. • Conference submission management system: Committee-managed system using Google’s suite of products. Submissions were received through Google forms and managed within Google drive. Correspondence with authors was conducted using Gmail. • Number of submissions received: 118 • Number of submissions sent for review: 118 • Number of submissions accepted: 62 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 52.5% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 106 • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): Plagiarism was checked using Turnitin, which is embedded in Canvas - Swinburne Sarawak’s course management system. • Contact person for queries: Jaka Sunarso ([email protected])

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering ◽

10.1088/1757-899x/1208/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1208 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Bosnia And Herzegovina ◽

Management System ◽

Review Process ◽

Materials Science ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Science And Engineering ◽

Double Blind ◽

Materials Science And Engineering ◽

Scientific Standards

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: Submission of papers and all correspondence between authors, technical secretary, editors, and reviewers were managed with our conference system “Submit System” (http://rim.tfb.ba/submitsystem/login). • Number of submissions received: 94 • Number of submissions sent for review: 89 • Number of submissions accepted: 44 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 46,81% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 to 3 • Total number of reviewers involved: 68 • Any additional info on review process:- • Contact person for queries: Aladin Crnkic, PhD, secretary of RIM 2021 conference; [email protected]; Irfana Ljubijankica bb, 77000 Bihac, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Download Full-text

Preface

IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering ◽

10.1088/1757-899x/1193/1/011001 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1193 (1) ◽

pp. 011001

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Review Process ◽

Materials Science ◽

Peer Review Process ◽

Science And Engineering ◽

Engineering Society ◽

Materials Science And Engineering ◽

Ninth Edition ◽

Manufacturing Engineering ◽

The University

As the Chairman of the 9th edition of the Manufacturing Engineering Society International Conference (MESIC 2021) held in Gijόn (Spain) from 23 to 25 of June 2021, I have the honour to present the papers discussed at the conference by researchers and professionals from 18 different countries. This ninth edition was organized by the Manufacturing Engineering Area of the University of Oviedo on behalf of the Manufacturing Engineering Society (SIF). The conference was first held in Calatayud (Spain) in 2005, with the main objective of becoming a forum for the exchange of experiences between national and international researchers and professionals in the field of Manufacturing Engineering. The rest of the editions have been celebrated up to now with this same vocation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (MSE) publishes here the 140 papers, organised according to the topics of the Conference, that were finally accepted for presentation at the MESIC 2021 after a rigorous peer review process. List of Committees Organizing Committee, Scientific Committee, Editors, Organizer, Promoter and Sponsors and this titles are available in this pdf.

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering ◽

10.1088/1757-899x/1212/1/011002 ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 1212 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Materials Science ◽

Quality Criteria ◽

Plagiarism Detection ◽

Science And Engineering ◽

Materials Science And Engineering ◽

And Mathematics ◽

Minimum Criteria ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind Each submitted paper reviewed by two minimum of reviewers after meet the minimum criteria. The review based on the following aspects: 1) Technical Criteria (Scientific merit, Clarity of expression, and Sufficient discussion of the context of the work, and suitable referencing); 2) Quality Criteria (Originality, Motivation, Repetition, Length); and 3) presentation criteria (Title, Abstract, Diagram, figures, tables and captions, Text and mathematics, and Conclusion). We also used iThenticate for plagiarism detection. • Conference submission management system: Easychair • Number of submissions received: 125 • Number of submissions sent for review: 117 • Number of submissions accepted: 90 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 90/125 = 72% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 Reviewers • Total number of reviewers involved: 36 • Any additional info on review process: No • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr. Anita Ahmad Kasim Affiliation: Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia Email : [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering ◽

10.1088/1757-899x/1207/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1207 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Management System ◽

Review Process ◽

Materials Science ◽

Science And Engineering ◽

Screening Process ◽

Materials Science And Engineering ◽

Final Manuscript ◽

Paper Review ◽

Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. · Type of peer review: Single-blind · Conference submission management system: SoftConf.com (https://www.softconf.com/l/phm2021) · Number of submissions received: 203 · Number of submissions sent for review: 121 · Number of submissions accepted: 25 · Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 12.3% · Average number of reviews per paper: 2 · Total number of reviewers involved: 46 · Any additional info on review process: Papers out of the scopes of the conference had been rejected in an initial paper screening process. Papers passing the initial screening process had been further evaluated by a group of experts in the field to make sure they meet the necessary standards for acceptance and publication. Each paper underwent formal paper review by at least two reviewers in terms of appropriateness, clarity, originality/Innovativeness, and Overall Recommendation. We used professional conference paper management system “SOFTCONF” in coordinating the paper review process and communicating with the authors. A paper was accepted for presentation and publication only if the comments from both reviewers are positive. The reviewers’ comments had been provided to the authors so that they could follow the suggestions from the reviewers to further improve their papers. The authors were required to highlight the revisions in red in the final manuscript so that the Paper Review Committee could check to ensure the reviewers’ comments were accommodated in the revised manuscript. · Contact person for queries: Jie (Peter) Liu, Professor, Carleton University; Email: [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

Journal of Physics Conference Series ◽

10.1088/1742-6596/2129/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2129 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Management System ◽

Review Process ◽

Peer Review Process ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Conference Series ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: Google Form and Google Classroom • Number of submissions received: 183 • Number of submissions sent for review: 158 • Number of submissions accepted: 148 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 80.9% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 15 • Any additional info on review process: The Peer Review Process for a Conference is available in this pdf.

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

Journal of Physics Conference Series ◽

10.1088/1742-6596/2088/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2088 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Management System ◽

Review Process ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Scientific Committee ◽

Contact Person ◽

Registration Number ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind ◽

Engineering Institute

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: The system developed in the information and computing centre of NRU MPEI ([email protected]). All the files and information necessary for registration are uploaded to the conference website, after which the report is assigned a registration number that is used to identify the article • Number of submissions received: 71 • Number of submissions sent for review: 71 • Number of submissions accepted: 56 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 69,6 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2.126 • Total number of reviewers involved: 152 • Any additional info on review process: The reviewers were members of the scientific committee and scientists (foreign and domestic) who are experts in each of the presented topics • Contact person for queries: Name : Pyatnitskaya Natalia Affiliation: National Research Univercity Moscow Power Engineering Institute Email : [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review Declaration

Journal of Physics Conference Series ◽

10.1088/1742-6596/2042/1/011003 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2042 (1) ◽

pp. 011003

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Review Process ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Scientific Committee ◽

Double Blind ◽

Whole Process ◽

Peer Reviewers ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind ◽

Submission Date

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will publish the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) 1st phase, abstracts: double-blind peer review (2 scientific committee members and discussion by programming committee). 2nd phase, papers: single-blind peer review (1-2 peer reviewers plus editors). • Conference submission management system: ConfTool • Number of submissions received: 1st phase, abstracts: 341 2nd phase, papers: 201 • Number of submissions sent for review: 1st phase, abstracts: 341 2nd phase, papers: 201 • Number of submissions accepted: 1st phase, abstracts: 281 2nd phase, papers: 185 Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 1st phase, abstracts: 82% 2nd phase, papers: 92% Whole process (no submitted abstracts – accepted papers): 54% • Average number of reviews per paper: 1.2 (not counting editors’ reviewing) • Total number of reviewers involved: 95 • Any additional info on review process: Authors were given the possibility to revise papers up to two times. Editors carefully checked the papers and corrections themselves. • Contact person for queries: Name : Barbara Smith, Co-Editor Affiliation: EPFL LESO-PB Email : [email protected]

Download Full-text