scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2022 ◽  
Vol 1213 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Science And Engineering ◽  
Materials Science And Engineering ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: All the manuscripts received form the authors were sent to the reviewers. Each manuscript was reviewed by one reviewer and re-checked by editor. All comments were sent back to the authors to let them make all corrections. The revised versions of manuscripts were checked and approved by editors. • Number of submissions received: 15 • Number of submissions sent for review: 15 • Number of submissions accepted:11 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100):73.3 • Average number of reviews per paper: 1 • Total number of reviewers involved:10 • Any additional info on review process: Reviewers considered manuscripts in accordance with: 1) Technical Criteria: scientific rigour, accuracy, correctness of selected methodology. 2) Quality Criteria: originality and novelty, clarity of motivation and results importance. 3) Presentation Criteria: clarity of expression, readability and completeness of presentation, quality of all presented data and figures. • Contact person for queries: Name: Sergey Dubinskiy Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2022 ◽  
Vol 1217 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Scientific Committee ◽  
Science And Engineering ◽  
Materials Science And Engineering ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind The single-blind peer-review method was used for the peer-review process. • Conference submission management system: The papers are emailed to the Secretariat and managed internally. • Number of submissions received: 21 • Number of submissions sent for review: 21 • Number of submissions accepted: 17 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received × 100): 81% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 26 • Any additional info on review process: List of Secretariat stage, Scientific Committee stage, Adjudicator are available in this pdf.

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1195 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Science And Engineering ◽  
Materials Science And Engineering ◽  
Check System ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind (authors’ identities are known to the reviewers, reviewers’ identities are hidden from authors) • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? Reviewers were requested to review the manuscripts by pointing out the strengths, weaknesses, errors, omissions, and inconsistencies in the papers. Authors were encouraged to revise the papers based on the reviewer’s comments. The review process was then repeated until the reviewers were satisfied with the quality of the submissions. • Conference submission management system: Committee-managed system using Google’s suite of products. Submissions were received through Google forms and managed within Google drive. Correspondence with authors was conducted using Gmail. • Number of submissions received: 118 • Number of submissions sent for review: 118 • Number of submissions accepted: 62 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 52.5% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 106 • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): Plagiarism was checked using Turnitin, which is embedded in Canvas - Swinburne Sarawak’s course management system. • Contact person for queries: Jaka Sunarso ([email protected])

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2022 ◽  
Vol 1212 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Plagiarism Detection ◽  
Science And Engineering ◽  
Materials Science And Engineering ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Minimum Criteria ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind Each submitted paper reviewed by two minimum of reviewers after meet the minimum criteria. The review based on the following aspects: 1) Technical Criteria (Scientific merit, Clarity of expression, and Sufficient discussion of the context of the work, and suitable referencing); 2) Quality Criteria (Originality, Motivation, Repetition, Length); and 3) presentation criteria (Title, Abstract, Diagram, figures, tables and captions, Text and mathematics, and Conclusion). We also used iThenticate for plagiarism detection. • Conference submission management system: Easychair • Number of submissions received: 125 • Number of submissions sent for review: 117 • Number of submissions accepted: 90 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 90/125 = 72% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 Reviewers • Total number of reviewers involved: 36 • Any additional info on review process: No • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr. Anita Ahmad Kasim Affiliation: Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1208 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Bosnia And Herzegovina ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Science And Engineering ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Materials Science And Engineering ◽  
Scientific Standards

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: Submission of papers and all correspondence between authors, technical secretary, editors, and reviewers were managed with our conference system “Submit System” (http://rim.tfb.ba/submitsystem/login). • Number of submissions received: 94 • Number of submissions sent for review: 89 • Number of submissions accepted: 44 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 46,81% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 to 3 • Total number of reviewers involved: 68 • Any additional info on review process:- • Contact person for queries: Aladin Crnkic, PhD, secretary of RIM 2021 conference; [email protected]; Irfana Ljubijankica bb, 77000 Bihac, Bosnia and Herzegovina

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1192 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Science And Engineering ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Materials Science And Engineering ◽  
Funding Information ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other Double Blind- Remove the author names and affiliations of the authors anywhere in the manuscript. Remove names and affiliations under the title within the manuscript. Do not include or remove any author names or affiliations in the Acknowledgements section of your manuscript. Author names and Funding information should be removed and can be included later in the peer review process. Do not sign your author response, rebuttals, or appeals with author names. Do not include or remove any names in any file names and ensure document properties are also anonymised. Check that your figures and schemes do not include author details. • Conference submission management system: ∘ https://easychair.org/conferences/submissions?a=26389499 • Number of submissions received: 114 (Abstract) • Number of submissions sent for review: 68 • Number of submissions accepted: 59 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 55.6% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 83 • Any additional info on review process: Turnitin was used to check plagiarism. • Contact person for queries: Assoc. Prof. Ir. Dr. Sarina Sulaiman, Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia. Email: [email protected] Assoc. Prof. Dr Noor Noor Illi, Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia. Email: [email protected] Dr Mohd Firdaus Abd Wahab, Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia. Email: [email protected] Prof. Dr. Zahangir Alam, Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia. Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1209 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Science And Engineering ◽  
The Status ◽  
Review Form ◽  
Materials Science And Engineering ◽  
Scientific Standards

• All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. Type of peer review: The review process was of an open peer review type. Each article was reviewed by two reviewers. First review was provided by the author, who addressed the reviewer himself and made the revisions in the article before submitting both article and the review form. The first reviewer was asked to be someone close to their research, who could provide helpful advice. Second review was provided mostly by employees of Technical University of Košice. The reviewers reviewed articles close to their research area. They were provided with full articles including the authors names and the authors then received the review form which included the reviewer’s name. The authors had then an opportunity to revise the papers and the papers were accepted only after the authors made the changes asked for by the second reviewer in their articles. In the review form the reviewers were asked to judge the quality of the paper, choosing from options: excellent, good, average, or poor; provide some comments to support their argument and give the authors some notes to help them improve the quality of their paper. For the conclusion of the review form the reviewers had to choose the status of acceptance of the paper, choosing from following options: accepted without revisions, accepted with minor revisions, accepted with major revisions, or rejected. If the paper was accepted without revisions, the authors were then not required to provide any revisions. If the second reviewer decided to choose the reject option, the authors did not have an option to revise their paper and the paper was rejected even if the first reviewer accepted the paper. • Conference submission management system: CaptainForm • Number of submissions received: 88 • Number of submissions sent for review: 88 • Number of submissions accepted: 87 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 98.86 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 99 • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: Kamila Kotrasová, [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1207 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Science And Engineering ◽  
Screening Process ◽  
Materials Science And Engineering ◽  
Final Manuscript ◽  
Paper Review ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. · Type of peer review: Single-blind · Conference submission management system: SoftConf.com (https://www.softconf.com/l/phm2021) · Number of submissions received: 203 · Number of submissions sent for review: 121 · Number of submissions accepted: 25 · Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 12.3% · Average number of reviews per paper: 2 · Total number of reviewers involved: 46 · Any additional info on review process: Papers out of the scopes of the conference had been rejected in an initial paper screening process. Papers passing the initial screening process had been further evaluated by a group of experts in the field to make sure they meet the necessary standards for acceptance and publication. Each paper underwent formal paper review by at least two reviewers in terms of appropriateness, clarity, originality/Innovativeness, and Overall Recommendation. We used professional conference paper management system “SOFTCONF” in coordinating the paper review process and communicating with the authors. A paper was accepted for presentation and publication only if the comments from both reviewers are positive. The reviewers’ comments had been provided to the authors so that they could follow the suggestions from the reviewers to further improve their papers. The authors were required to highlight the revisions in red in the final manuscript so that the Paper Review Committee could check to ensure the reviewers’ comments were accommodated in the revised manuscript. · Contact person for queries: Jie (Peter) Liu, Professor, Carleton University; Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2059 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Saint Petersburg ◽  
Email Address ◽  
Mail Address ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: Through official e-mail address ([email protected]) • Number of submissions received: 34 • Number of submissions sent for review: 30 • Number of submissions accepted: 30 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 88 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 10 • Any additional info on review process: All submitted papers were preliminary evaluated for compliance with the topic of the conference and the quality of the paper preparation, after that the remaining papers went through single-blind peer review, with each paper sent to two reviewers for evaluation. • Contact person for queries (please include: name, affiliation, institutional email address) Dmitrii Kostrin Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI” [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2022 ◽  
Vol 2149 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Review Criteria ◽  
Submission Date

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind (please describe) Single-anonymous: authors’ identities are known to the reviewers, reviewers’ identities are hidden from authors • Conference submission management system: Via email messages between editor and authors and editor and reviewers. • Number of submissions received: 18 • Number of submissions sent for review: 18 • Number of submissions accepted:18 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100):100 • Average number of reviews per paper: 1.11 • Total number of reviewers involved:20 • Any additional info on review process: The following review criteria were suggested: • Are the scientific methods and assumptions valid and clearly outlined? • Are the results sufficient to support the interpretations and conclusions? • Is the overall presentation well structured and clear? • Is the description of experiments and calculations sufficiently complete and precise to allow their reproduction by fellow scientists (traceability of results)? • Are mathematical formulae, symbols, abbreviations, and units correctly defined and used? • Are the number and quality of references appropriate? • Contact person for queries: Name : Julian Gröbner Affiliation: Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos, World Radiation Center (PMOD/WRC), Davos Dorf, Switzerland. Email :[email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2057 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Selection Of

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the proceedings Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. Professional translators took part in the preparation of the articles to ensure the good quality of the language. All articles received professional proofreading, in accordance with the requirements of the publisher. The selection of papers was made on the basis of conference abstracts. Total number of contributions received: 275. On the recommendation of the organizing committee, the most significant contributions were proposed for publication in the Journal of Physics: Conference Series. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe): Double-blind for most articles and Triple-blind for articles with ambiguous reviews • Conference submission management system: ConfTool Pro 2.6.137 • Number of submissions received: 142 • Number of submissions sent for review: 142 • Number of submissions accepted: 142 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 100 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2.05 • Total number of reviewers involved: 21 • Any additional info on review process: only recommended by the organizing committee contributions were proposed for reviewing and publication in the Journal of Physics: Conference Series. • Contact person for queries: Maksim Sergeyevich Makarov, Kutateladze Institute of Thermophysics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, [email protected]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document