A GENERIC formalism for Korteweg-type fluids: II. Higher-order models and relation to microforces

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 025510
Author(s):  
Yukihito Suzuki
2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (14) ◽  
pp. 4130-4136
Author(s):  
David J Burks ◽  
Rajeev K Azad

Abstract Motivation Alignment-free, stochastic models derived from k-mer distributions representing reference genome sequences have a rich history in the classification of DNA sequences. In particular, the variants of Markov models have previously been used extensively. Higher-order Markov models have been used with caution, perhaps sparingly, primarily because of the lack of enough training data and computational power. Advances in sequencing technology and computation have enabled exploitation of the predictive power of higher-order models. We, therefore, revisited higher-order Markov models and assessed their performance in classifying metagenomic sequences. Results Comparative assessment of higher-order models (HOMs, 9th order or higher) with interpolated Markov model, interpolated context model and lower-order models (8th order or lower) was performed on metagenomic datasets constructed using sequenced prokaryotic genomes. Our results show that HOMs outperform other models in classifying metagenomic fragments as short as 100 nt at all taxonomic ranks, and at lower ranks when the fragment size was increased to 250 nt. HOMs were also found to be significantly more accurate than local alignment which is widely relied upon for taxonomic classification of metagenomic sequences. A novel software implementation written in C++ performs classification faster than the existing Markovian metagenomic classifiers and can therefore be used as a standalone classifier or in conjunction with existing taxonomic classifiers for more robust classification of metagenomic sequences. Availability and implementation The software has been made available at https://github.com/djburks/SMM. Contact [email protected] Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.


2015 ◽  
Vol 138 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Minoru Watari

Lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) whose equilibrium distribution function contains higher-order terms is called higher-order LBM. It is expected that nonequilibrium physics beyond the Navier–Stokes can be accurately captured using the higher-order LBM. Relationship between the level of higher-order and the simulation accuracy of rarefied gas flows is studied. Theoretical basis for constructing higher-order LBM is presented. On this basis, specific higher-order models are constructed. To confirm that the models have been correctly constructed, verification simulations are performed focusing on the continuum regime: sound wave and supersonic flow in Laval nozzle. With applications to microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) in mind, low Mach number flows are studied. Shear flow and heat conduction between parallel walls in the slip flow regime are investigated to confirm the relaxation process in the Knudsen layer. Problems between concentric cylinders are investigated from the slip flow regime to the free molecule regime to confirm the effect of boundary curvature. The accuracy is discussed comparing the simulation results with pioneers' studies. Models of the fourth-order give sufficient accuracy even for highly rarefied gas flows. Increase of the particle directions is necessary as the Knudsen number increases.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 313-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renaud Lambiotte ◽  
Martin Rosvall ◽  
Ingo Scholtes

2016 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 79-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes M. Giesinger ◽  
Jacobien M. Kieffer ◽  
Peter M. Fayers ◽  
Mogens Groenvold ◽  
Morten Aa. Petersen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Philip Hyland ◽  
Jamie Murphy ◽  
Mark Shevlin ◽  
Richard P. Bentall ◽  
Thanos Karatzias ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Dimensional models of psychopathology are increasingly common and there is evidence for the existence of a general dimension of psychopathology (‘p’). The existing literature presents two ways to model p: as a bifactor or as a higher-order dimension. Bifactor models typically fit sample data better than higher-order models, and are often selected as better fitting alternatives but there are reasons to be cautious of such an approach to model selection. In this study the bifactor and higher-order models of p were compared in relation to associations with established risk variables for mental illness. Methods A trauma exposed community sample from the United Kingdom (N = 1051) completed self-report measures of 49 symptoms of psychopathology. Results A higher-order model with four first-order dimensions (Fear, Distress, Externalising and Thought Disorder) and a higher-order p dimension provided satisfactory model fit, and a bifactor representation provided superior model fit. Bifactor p and higher-order p were highly correlated (r = 0.97) indicating that both parametrisations produce near equivalent general dimensions of psychopathology. Latent variable models including predictor variables showed that the risk variables explained more variance in higher-order p than bifactor p. The higher-order model produced more interpretable associations for the first-order/specific dimensions compared to the bifactor model. Conclusions The higher-order representation of p, as described in the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology, appears to be a more appropriate way to conceptualise the general dimension of psychopathology than the bifactor approach. The research and clinical implications of these discrepant ways of modelling p are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document