controller design
Recently Published Documents





2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Uma Yadav ◽  
Anju Gupta ◽  
Rajesh kr Ahuja

2022 ◽  
Vol 169 ◽  
pp. 108931
Jiaoshen Xu ◽  
Hui Tang ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
Ge Qin ◽  
Xin Jin ◽  

2022 ◽  
Vol 206 ◽  
pp. 107781
Hashim A. Al Hassan ◽  
Thamer Alharbi ◽  
Zhi-Hong Mao ◽  
Brandon M. Grainger

2022 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-31
Debayan Roy ◽  
Licong Zhang ◽  
Wanli Chang ◽  
Dip Goswami ◽  
Birgit Vogel-Heuser ◽  

Controller design and their software implementations are usually done in isolated design spaces using respective COTS design tools. However, this separation of concerns can lead to long debugging and integration phases. This is because assumptions made about the implementation platform during the design phase—e.g., related to timing—might not hold in practice, thereby leading to unacceptable control performance. In order to address this, several control/architecture co-design techniques have been proposed in the literature. However, their adoption in practice has been hampered by the lack of design flows using commercial tools. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first article that implements such a co-design method using commercially available design tools in an automotive setting, with the aim of minimally disrupting existing design flows practiced in the industry. The goal of such co-design is to jointly determine controller and platform parameters in order to avoid any design-implementation gap , thereby minimizing implementation time testing and debugging. Our setting involves distributed implementations of control algorithms on automotive electronic control units ( ECUs ) communicating via a FlexRay bus. The co-design and the associated toolchain Co-Flex jointly determines controller and FlexRay parameters (that impact signal delays) in order to optimize specified design metrics. Co-Flex seamlessly integrates the modeling and analysis of control systems in MATLAB/Simulink with platform modeling and configuration in SIMTOOLS/SIMTARGET that is used for configuring FlexRay bus parameters. It automates the generation of multiple Pareto-optimal design options with respect to the quality of control and the resource usage, that an engineer can choose from. In this article, we outline a step-by-step software development process based on Co-Flex tools for distributed control applications. While our exposition is automotive specific, this design flow can easily be extended to other domains.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document