Stability of 5P12-RANTES, A Candidate Rectal Microbicide, in Human Rectal Lavage

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 768-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrice Cerini ◽  
Robin Offord ◽  
Ian McGowan ◽  
Oliver Hartley
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 1002-1015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather A. Pines ◽  
Pamina M. Gorbach ◽  
Robert E. Weiss ◽  
Kristen Hess ◽  
Ryan Murphy ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e0158310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian McGowan ◽  
Ross D. Cranston ◽  
Kenneth H. Mayer ◽  
Irma Febo ◽  
Kathryn Duffill ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1484-1493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Carballo-Dieguez ◽  
Rebecca Giguere ◽  
Cody Lentz ◽  
Curtis Dolezal ◽  
Edward J. Fuchs ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 393-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Giguere ◽  
William Brown III ◽  
Ivan C Balán ◽  
Curtis Dolezal ◽  
Titcha Ho ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective During a Phase 2 rectal microbicide trial, men who have sex with men and transgender women (n = 187) in 4 countries (Peru, South Africa, Thailand, United States) reported product use daily via short message service (SMS). To prevent disclosure of study participation, the SMS system program included privacy and security features. We evaluated participants’ perceptions of privacy while using the system and acceptability of privacy/security features. Materials and Methods To protect privacy, the SMS system: (1) confirmed participant availability before sending the study questions, (2) required a password, and (3) did not reveal product name or study participation. To ensure security, the system reminded participants to lock phone/delete messages. A computer-assisted self-interview (CASI), administered at the final visit, measured burden of privacy and security features and SMS privacy concerns. A subsample of 33 participants underwent an in-depth interview (IDI). Results Based on CASI, 85% had no privacy concerns; only 5% were very concerned. Most were not bothered by the need for a password (73%) or instructions to delete messages (82%). Based on IDI, reasons for low privacy concerns included sending SMS in private or feeling that texting would not draw attention. A few IDI participants found the password unnecessary and more than half did not delete messages. Discussion Most participants were not concerned that the SMS system would compromise their confidentiality. SMS privacy and security features were effective and not burdensome. Conclusion Short ID-related passwords, ambiguous language, and reminders to implement privacy and security-enhancing behaviors are recommended for SMS systems.


2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 412-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
José A. Bauermeister ◽  
R. Giguere ◽  
C. S. Leu ◽  
C. Dolezal ◽  
I. Febo ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 633-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Giguere ◽  
Curtis Dolezal ◽  
José A. Bauermeister ◽  
Timothy Frasca ◽  
Juan Valladares ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 564-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen R. Tabet ◽  
Christina Surawicz ◽  
Scott Horton ◽  
Mary Paradise ◽  
Anne S. Coletti ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bauermeister ◽  
R. Giguere ◽  
C. Dolezal ◽  
C. S. Leu ◽  
I. Febo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document