Extra-anatomical stents in benign ureteric obstruction; experience and outcomes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Brophy ◽  
Thomas Thompson ◽  
Richard Napier-Hemy
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2354
Author(s):  
Francesca J. New ◽  
Sally J. Deverill ◽  
Bhaskar K. Somani

Background: Malignant ureteric obstruction occurs in a variety of cancers and has been typically associated with a poor prognosis. Percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) can potentially help increase patient longevity by establishing urinary drainage and treating renal failure. Our aim was to look at the outcomes of PCN in patients with advanced cancer and the impact on the patients’ lifespan and quality of life. Materials and Methods: A literature review was carried out for articles from 2000 to 2020 on PCN in patients with advanced malignancies, using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar. All English-language articles reporting on a minimum of 20 patients who underwent PCN for malignancy-associated ureteric obstruction were included. Results: A total of 21 articles (1674 patients) met the inclusion criteria with a mean of 60.2 years (range: 21–102 years). PCN was performed for ureteric obstruction secondary to urological malignancies (n = −633, 37.8%), gynaecological malignancies (n = 437, 26.1%), colorectal and GI malignancies (n = 216, 12.9%), and other specified malignancies (n = 205, 12.2%). The reported mean survival times varied from 2 to 8.5 months post PCN insertion, with an average survival time of 5.6 months, which depended on the cancer type, stage, and previous treatment. Conclusions: Patients with advanced malignancies who need PCN tend to have a survival rate under 12 months and spend a large proportion of this time in the hospital. Although the advent of newer chemotherapy and immunotherapy options has changed the landscape of managing advanced cancer, decisions on nephrostomy must be balanced with their survival and quality of life, which must be discussed with the patient.


1989 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Mortensen ◽  
Peer Christiansen ◽  
Niels Harving ◽  
Finn Taagehøj-Jensen ◽  
Jens C. Djurhuus

Urology ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 540-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy A. Filly ◽  
Gerald W. Friedland ◽  
William R. Fair ◽  
Duncan E. Govan

Urology ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 451-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soman Bhattacharya ◽  
Sheila Overton ◽  
Ron Yang ◽  
Shlomo Raz

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. e238669
Author(s):  
Liam Joseph Beamer ◽  
Sarah Neary ◽  
Thomas McCormack ◽  
David Ankers

We describe the first reported case of transient distal ureteric obstruction attributed to post-surgical oedema in a patient with a solitary kidney. This occurred following combined pelvic floor repair and sacrospinous fixation for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse and manifested clinically as anuria, radiological hydroureter and acute kidney injury in the postoperative period. The transient nature of this obstruction, which was managed by a temporary percutaneous nephrostomy, indicates that it was caused by ureteric compression secondary to soft tissue oedema following surgery. We highlight the importance of this potential complication in females with a history of nephrectomy, unilateral renal tract anomalies or severely diminished renal reserve.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document