scholarly journals Intraocular Injection of HyStem Hydrogel Is Tolerated Well in the Rabbit Eye

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-71
Author(s):  
Randolph D. Glickman ◽  
Michael Onorato ◽  
Maria M. Campos ◽  
Michael P. O'Boyle ◽  
Ratnesh K. Singh ◽  
...  
1985 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel F. Refojo

ABSTRACTImplants are essential for the repair of retinal detachments. The implant buckles the wall of the eye and apposes the detached retina with the choroid, thus restoring light sensitivity to the retina. The scleral buckling also relieves traction on the retina from a shrinking vitreous body. The implant materials most commonly used are solid silicone rubber and silicone sponges, but both types have some disadvantages. A poly(hydroxyethyl acrylate-co-methyl acrylate) hydrogel implant with improved properties of softness and antibiotic absorption is also available for retinal detachment surgery. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy involves various conditions of retinal detachment complicated by vitreous fibrosis, which, after vitrectomy, may be treated with intraocular injection of fluids that support the retina against the choroid. For conditions requiring a long-term implant, silicone oil although controversial is the material of choice. Many other substances have been investigated but none better has yet been found.


1992 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-163
Author(s):  
Francis H. Kruszewski ◽  
Laura H. Hearn ◽  
Kyle T. Smith ◽  
Janice J. Teal ◽  
Virginia C. Gordon ◽  
...  

465 cosmetic product formulations and raw ingredients were evaluated with the EYTEX™ system to determine the potential of this in vitro alternative for identifying eye irritation potential. The EYTEX™ system is a non-animal, biochemical procedure developed by Ropak Laboratories, Irvine, CA, that was designed to approximate the Draize rabbit eye irritation assay for the evaluation of ocular irritation. Avon Products Inc. provided all the test samples, which included over 30 different product types and represented a wide range of eye irritancy. All the EYTEX™ protocols available at the time of this study were used. Samples were evaluated double-blind with both the membrane partition assay (MPA) and the rapid membrane assay (RMA). When appropriate, the standard assay (STD) and the alkaline membrane assay (AMA) were used, as well as specific, documented protocol modifications. EYTEX™ results were correlated with rabbit eye irritation data which was obtained from the historical records of Avon Products Inc. A positive agreement of EYTEX™ results with the in vivo assay was demonstrated by an overall concordance of 80%. The assay error was 20%, of which 18% was due to an overestimation of sample irritancy (false positives) and 2% was attributed to underestimation (false negatives). Overestimation error in this study was due in part to the inability of the protocols to accurately classify test samples with very low irritation potential. Underestimation of sample irritancy was generally associated with ethoxylated materials and high concentrations of specific types of surfactants. 100% sensitivity and 85% predictability were described by the data, indicating the efficiency of EYTEX™ in identifying known irritants. A specificity rate of 39% showed the EYTEX™ assay to be weak in discerning non-irritants. However, the EYTEX™ protocols used in this study were not designed to identify non-irritants. A compatibility rate of 99% proved the effectiveness of the EYTEX™ assay in accommodating a diversity of product types. The EYTEX™ system protocols, when used appropriately, can provide a conservative means of assessing the irritant potential of most cosmetic formulations and their ingredients.


1987 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolf A. Walstad ◽  
Sigmund Blika ◽  
Elsf Thurmann-Nielsen ◽  
Tore B. Halvorsen
Keyword(s):  

1955 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 472-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. GREEN ◽  
C. A. BOCHER ◽  
I. H. LEOPOLD ◽  
J. L. Sawyer ◽  
A. P. Rosenberg ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document